Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28844816›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Guadecitabine (SGI-110) in treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia: phase 2 results from a multicentre, randomised, phase 1/2 trial.

Hagop M Kantarjian, Gail J Roboz, Patricia L Kropf, Karen W L Yee, Casey L O'Connell, Raoul Tibes, Katherine J Walsh, Nikolai A Podoltsev, Elizabeth A Griffiths, Elias Jabbour and 11 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Epigenetic Targeting in Myeloid Malignancies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  20. Tumor biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Hagop M KantarjianUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: hkantarjian@mdanderson.org.
Gail J RobozWeill Cornell Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, the New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Patricia L KropfFox Chase Cancer Center, Jeanes Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Karen W L YeePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Casey L O'ConnellUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Raoul TibesMayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA; Department of Internal Medicine II/Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Katherine J WalshOhio State University, James Cancer Hospital, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nikolai A PodoltsevYale University School of Medicine, Hematology Division, New Haven, CT, USA.
Elizabeth A GriffithsRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Elias JabbourUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, USA.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, USA.
David RizzieriDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Wendy StockUniversity of Chicago, MC2115, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael R SavonaVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Nashville, TN, USA.
Todd L RosenblatNew York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jesus G BerdejaSarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
Farhad RavandiUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Leukemia, Houston, TX, USA.
Edwin P RockAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Yong HaoAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Mohammad AzabAstex Pharmaceuticals, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Jean-Pierre J IssaFels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University, Philadelphia PA, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KONOPLEVA, MARINA Y · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hypomethylating drugs azacitidine and decitabine have shown efficacy in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia, but complete tumour responses are infrequent and of short duration, possibly because of the short half-lives and suboptimal bone marrow exposure of the drugs. Guadecitabine, a next-generation hypomethylating drug, has a longer half-life and exposure than its active metabolite decitabine. A phase 1 study established 60 mg/m

methodsWe did a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 1/2 study of guadecitabine in cohorts of patients with treatment-naive acute myeloid leukaemia, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes; here we report the phase 2 results from the cohort of treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. We included patients aged at least 65 years from 14 US medical centres (hospitals and specialist cancer clinics) who were not candidates for intensive chemotherapy and randomly assigned them (1:1) using a computer algorithm (for dynamic randomisation) to guadecitabine 60 or 90 mg/m

findingsBetween Aug 24, 2012, and Sept 15, 2014, 107 patients were enrolled: 54 on the 5-day schedule (26 randomly assigned to 60 mg/m

interpretationMore than half of older treatment-naive patients with acute myeloid leukaemia achieved a composite complete response with guadecitabine at all drug doses and schedules investigated, with tolerable toxicity. The recommended guadecitabine regimen for this population is 60 mg/m

fundingAstex Pharmaceuticals and Stand Up To Cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAzacitidineDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingAzacitidineguadecitabine

Identifiers

PMID28844816
PMCPMC5925750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.