Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28844381›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of infection control2017

Assessment of half-mask elastomeric respirator and powered air-purifying respirator reprocessing for an influenza pandemic.

Caryn Lawrence, Delbert A Harnish, Megan Sandoval-Powers, Devin Mills, Michael Bergman, Brian K Heimbuch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of infection control, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caryn LawrenceEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Panama City, FL.
Delbert A HarnishEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Panama City, FL. Electronic address: dharnish@ara.com.
Megan Sandoval-PowersEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Panama City, FL.
Devin MillsEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Panama City, FL.
Michael BergmanNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA.
Brian K HeimbuchEngineering Science Division, Applied Research Associates, Panama City, FL.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care facilities are considering the use of reusable respiratory protective devices (RPDs) to mitigate a potential N95 filtering facepiece respirator shortage caused by an influenza pandemic. US regulators are also considering stockpiling reusable RPDs for pandemic preparedness, but limited data exist on the effectiveness of cleaning and disinfection of these devices. This study defines reprocessing protocols and evaluates their effectiveness against a pandemic influenza strain in a laboratory setting.

methodsFive half-mask elastomeric respirator models and 3 powered air-purifying respirator models were contaminated with influenza virus and artificial skin oil on multiple surfaces. RPDs were then manually treated with 1 of 2 methods: cleaned or cleaned and disinfected. Presence of viable influenza was determined via swab sampling and a median tissue culture infectious dose assay.

resultsAcross 41 RPD surfaces, a mean log reduction in viable influenza of 4.54 ± 0.97 log

conclusionsThe methods defined as part of this study are effective for eliminating viable influenza in the presence of artificial skin oil on most of the RPD surfaces tested. Material type and RPD design should be considered when implementing RPD reprocessing protocols.

Indexed as

MasksPandemicsRespiratory Protective DevicesVentilators, MechanicalDisinfectionHumansInfluenza, HumanCleaning infection controlDisinfectionMucinN95Respiratory protectionReuseSebum

Identifiers

PMID28844381
PMCPMC6193495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.