Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28844219›Full record

ReviewProgress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy2017

Static solid-state

Liliya Vugmeyster, Dmitry Ostrovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Persistence of Methionine Side Chain Mobility at Low Temperatures in a Nine-Residue Low Complexity Peptide, as Probed byChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of Cross-Seeding of Wild-Type Amyloid-βThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2023
    Article
  10. Deuteron rotating frame relaxation for the detection of slow motions in rotating solids.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Surface NMR using quantum sensors in diamond.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Advances in studying protein disorder with solid-state NMR.Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liliya VugmeysterUniversity of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA. Electronic address: liliya.vugmeyster@ucdenver.edu.
Dmitry OstrovskyUniversity of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO 80204, USA.

Funding

Variant-specific dynamics of amyloid-b fibrilsR15GM111681 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI VUGMEYSTER, LILIYA · 2014 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM111681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we discuss the experimental static deuteron NMR techniques and computational approaches most useful for the investigation of side-chain dynamics in protein systems. Focus is placed on the interpretation of line shape and relaxation data within the framework of motional modeling. We consider both jump and diffusion models and apply them to uncover glassy behaviors, conformational exchange and dynamical transitions in proteins. Applications are chosen from globular and membrane proteins, amyloid fibrils, peptide adsorbed on surfaces and proteins specific to connective tissues.

Indexed as

DeuteriumMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyPeptidesProtein ConformationProteinsDeuteriumPeptidesProteinsDynamical transitionsProtein dynamicsSolid-state NMRStatic deuteron NMR

Identifiers

PMID28844219
PMCPMC5576518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.