Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28844108›Full record

ArticleProtoplasma2018

Are holocentrics doomed to change? Limited chromosome number variation in Rhynchospora Vahl (Cyperaceae).

Tiago Ribeiro, Christopher E Buddenhagen, W Wayt Thomas, Gustavo Souza, Andrea Pedrosa-Harand

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Protoplasma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Holocentric Karyotype Evolution inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tiago RibeiroDepartamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Laboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.
Christopher E BuddenhagenDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
W Wayt ThomasNew York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, USA.
Gustavo SouzaDepartamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Laboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil.
Andrea Pedrosa-HarandDepartamento de Botânica, Centro de Biociências, Laboratório de Citogenética e Evolução Vegetal, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Av. Prof. Moraes Rego, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Recife, PE, 50670-901, Brazil. andrea.pedrosaharand@pq.cnpq.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5213-4770
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRFlorida State University · USNew York Botanical Garden · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karyotype evolution in species with non-localised centromeres (holocentric chromosomes) is usually very dynamic and associated with recurrent fission and fusion (also termed agmatoploidy/symploidy) events. In Rhynchospora (Cyperaceae), one of the most species-rich sedge genera, all analysed species have holocentric chromosomes and their numbers range from 2n = 4 to 2n = 84. Agmatoploidy/symploidy and polyploidy were suggested as the main processes in the reshuffling of Rhynchospora karyotypes, although testing different scenarios of chromosome number evolution in a phylogenetic framework has not been attempted until now. Here, we used maximum likelihood and model-based analyses, in combination with genome size estimation and ribosomal DNA distribution, to understand chromosome evolution in Rhynchospora. Overall, chromosome number variation showed a significant phylogenetic signal and the majority of the lineages maintained a karyotype of 2n = 10 (~48% of the species), the most likely candidate for the ancestral number of the genus. Higher and lower chromosome numbers were restricted to specific clades, whilst polyploidy and/or fusion/fission events were present in specific branches. Variation in genome size and ribosomal DNA site number showed no correlation with ploidy level or chromosome number. Although different mechanisms of karyotype evolution (polyploidy, fusion and fission) seem to be acting in distinct lineages, the degree of chromosome variation and the main mechanisms involved are comparable to those found in some monocentric genera and lower than expected for a holocentric genus.

Indexed as

PhylogenyChromosomes, PlantCyperaceaeDNA, RibosomalGenome, PlantKaryotypePolyploidyDNA, RibosomalAgmatoploidy/symploidyDysploidyGenome sizeHolokineticKaryotype evolutionPolyploidyrDNA

Identifiers

PMID28844108
OpenAlexW2747520255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.