Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28844039›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2017

Relationship between non-technical skills and technical performance during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: does stress have an influence?

Ralf Krage, Laura Zwaan, Lian Tjon Soei Len, Mark W Kolenbrander, Dick van Groeningen, Stephan A Loer, Cordula Wagner, Patrick Schober

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ralf KrageDepartment of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura ZwaanInstitute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lian Tjon Soei LenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
Mark W KolenbranderDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Dick van GroeningenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stephan A LoerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cordula WagnerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Patrick SchoberDepartment of Anaesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLEMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLRode Kruis Ziekenhuis · NLSpaarne Gasthuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-technical skills, such as task management, leadership, situational awareness, communication and decision-making refer to cognitive, behavioural and social skills that contribute to safe and efficient team performance. The importance of these skills during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is increasingly emphasised. Nonetheless, the relationship between non-technical skills and technical performance is poorly understood. We hypothesise that non-technical skills become increasingly important under stressful conditions when individuals are distracted from their tasks, and investigated the relationship between non-technical and technical skills under control conditions and when external stressors are present.

methodsIn this simulator-based randomised cross-over study, 30 anaesthesiologists and anaesthesia residents from the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, participated in two different CPR scenarios in random order. In one scenario, external stressors (radio noise and a distractive scripted family member) were added, while the other scenario without stressors served as control condition. Non-technical performance of the team leader and technical performance of the team were measured using the 'Anaesthetists' Non-technical Skill' score and a recently developed technical skills score. Analysis of variance and Pearson correlation coefficients were used for statistical analyses.

resultsNon-technical performance declined when external stressors were present (adjusted mean difference 3.9 points, 95% CI 2.4 to 5.5 points). A significant correlation between non-technical and technical performance scores was observed when external stressors were present (r=0.67, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.83, p<0.001), while no evidence for such a relationship was observed under control conditions (r=0.15, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.49, p=0.42). This was equally true for all individual domains of the non-technical performance score (task management, team working, situation awareness, decision-making).

conclusionsDuring CPR with external stressors, the team's technical performance is related to the non-technical skills of the team leader. This may have important implications for training of CPR teams.

Indexed as

AdultAwarenessCardiopulmonary ResuscitationClinical CompetenceCommunicationCross-Over StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleNetherlandsStress, Psychologicalacute carecardiac arresteducationresuscitationsafetyteachingtraining

Identifiers

PMID28844039
PMCPMC5750366
OpenAlexW2746494828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.