ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2018
Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.
Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adapting to a Shrunken World: A Grounded Theory of Resident Adaptation to Life in Residential Aged Care.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Patient-centered outcomes and outcome measurements for people aged 65 years and older-a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Nursing Home Resident Preferences for Daily Care and Activities: A Latent Class Analysis of National Data.The Gerontologist · 2024Article
- Measuring Nursing Home Quality of Life: Validated Measures Are Poorly Correlated With Proxies From MDS and Quality of Life Deficiency Citationsl.Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2023Article
- Paying for Nursing Home Quality: An Elusive But Important Goal.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- The Association Between Preference Satisfaction and Satisfaction with Overall Care for Nursing Home Residents.Journal of aging & social policy · 2022Article
- Wishes and Needs of Nursing Home Residents: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Satisfaction With Outdoor Activities Among Northeastern U.S. Newly Enrolled Long-Term Services and Supports Recipients.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021Article
- Activity Preferences Among Older People With Dementia Residing in Nursing Homes.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Unmet and Unimportant Preferences Among Nursing Home Residents: What Are Key Resident and Facility Factors?Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2020Article
- Selecting Outcomes to Ensure Pragmatic Trials Are Relevant to People Living with Dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2020Article
- Psychometric Evaluation of the Korean Version of the Personhood in Dementia Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Psychometric properties of the geriatric quality of life-dementia in older adults with dementia or mild cognitive impairment living in nursing homes.BMC geriatrics · 2019Article
- Exploring Preference Fulfillment Among Older Adults Receiving Long-Term Care: Consistency of Satisfaction Ratings.The annals of long-term care : the official journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019Article
- Preference Importance Ratings among African American and White Nursing Home Residents.Clinical gerontologistArticle
- Racial Disparities in Care Interactions and Clinical Outcomes in Black Versus White Nursing Home Residents With Dementia.Journal of nursing care qualityArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPerson-centered care (PCC), which considers nursing home resident preferences in care delivery, has been linked to important outcomes such as improved quality of life, resident satisfaction with care, and mood and reduced behavioral symptoms for residents with dementia. Delivery of PCC fundamentally relies on knowledge of resident preferences. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Preference Assessment Tool (PAT) is a standardized, abbreviated assessment that facilitates systematic examination of preferences from a population of nursing home residents. However, it is unknown how well the PAT discriminates preferences across residents or items. The purpose of this study was to use MDS 3.0 PAT data to describe (1) overall resident preferences, (2) variation in preferences across items, and (3) variation in preferences across residents. DATA: Data from admission MDS assessments between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 were used for this study. SAMPLE: A nationally representative sample of 244,718 residents over the age of 65 years who were able to complete the resident interview version of preference, cognition, and depression assessments were included. MEASUREMENTS: Importance ratings of 16 daily care and activity preferences were the primary outcome measures. Resident factors including function (MDS Activities of Daily Living-Long Form), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status), and sociodemographics (age, race, sex, and marital status) were used as predictors of important preferences. ANALYSIS: Overall preferences were examined using descriptive statistics. Proportional differences tests were used to describe variation across items. Logistic regression was used to describe variation in preferences across residents.
resultsThe majority of residents rated all 16 preferences important. However, there was variation across items and residents. Involvement of family in care and individualizing daily care and activities were rated important by the largest proportion of residents. Several resident factors including cognitive impairment, depression, sex, and race were significant predictors of preferences.
conclusionsFindings demonstrate the PAT captures variation in preferences across items and residents. Residents with possible depression and cognitive impairment were less likely to rate preferences important than residents without those conditions. Non-Caucasian and male residents reported some preferences differently than Caucasian and female residents. Additional assessment and care planning may be important for these residents. More research is needed to determine the factors that influence preferences and the ways to incorporate them into care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.