Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28843525›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2018

Important Care and Activity Preferences in a Nationally Representative Sample of Nursing Home Residents.

Tonya J Roberts, Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi, Maichou Lor, Daniel Liebzeit, Christopher J Crnich, Debra Saliba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Paying for Nursing Home Quality: An Elusive But Important Goal.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Satisfaction With Outdoor Activities Among Northeastern U.S. Newly Enrolled Long-Term Services and Supports Recipients.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring Preference Fulfillment Among Older Adults Receiving Long-Term Care: Consistency of Satisfaction Ratings.The annals of long-term care : the official journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tonya J RobertsWilliam S. Middleton Veteran Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI. Electronic address: tjbeal@wisc.edu.
Andrea Gilmore-BykovskyiWilliam S. Middleton Veteran Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI.
Maichou LorUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI.
Daniel LiebzeitUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI.
Christopher J CrnichWilliam S. Middleton Veteran Affairs Hospital, Madison, WI; University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Debra SalibaVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, CA; UCLA/JH Borun Center for Gerontological Research, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

Improving Analysis of Endogenous Multimodal Treatments for Use in Geriatrics Health Outcomes StudiesI01HX002237 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI GARRIDO, MELISSA M · 2018 to 2021
–
HSRD VA SDR 02-237
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerson-centered care (PCC), which considers nursing home resident preferences in care delivery, has been linked to important outcomes such as improved quality of life, resident satisfaction with care, and mood and reduced behavioral symptoms for residents with dementia. Delivery of PCC fundamentally relies on knowledge of resident preferences. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Preference Assessment Tool (PAT) is a standardized, abbreviated assessment that facilitates systematic examination of preferences from a population of nursing home residents. However, it is unknown how well the PAT discriminates preferences across residents or items. The purpose of this study was to use MDS 3.0 PAT data to describe (1) overall resident preferences, (2) variation in preferences across items, and (3) variation in preferences across residents. DATA: Data from admission MDS assessments between October 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011 were used for this study. SAMPLE: A nationally representative sample of 244,718 residents over the age of 65 years who were able to complete the resident interview version of preference, cognition, and depression assessments were included. MEASUREMENTS: Importance ratings of 16 daily care and activity preferences were the primary outcome measures. Resident factors including function (MDS Activities of Daily Living-Long Form), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status), and sociodemographics (age, race, sex, and marital status) were used as predictors of important preferences. ANALYSIS: Overall preferences were examined using descriptive statistics. Proportional differences tests were used to describe variation across items. Logistic regression was used to describe variation in preferences across residents.

resultsThe majority of residents rated all 16 preferences important. However, there was variation across items and residents. Involvement of family in care and individualizing daily care and activities were rated important by the largest proportion of residents. Several resident factors including cognitive impairment, depression, sex, and race were significant predictors of preferences.

conclusionsFindings demonstrate the PAT captures variation in preferences across items and residents. Residents with possible depression and cognitive impairment were less likely to rate preferences important than residents without those conditions. Non-Caucasian and male residents reported some preferences differently than Caucasian and female residents. Additional assessment and care planning may be important for these residents. More research is needed to determine the factors that influence preferences and the ways to incorporate them into care.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCognition DisordersCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNursing Homesculture changeNursing homesolder adultspatient-centered carepatient preferenceresident-centered care

Identifiers

PMID28843525
PMCPMC5742557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.