Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842986›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2017

Biosimilars: Key regulatory considerations and similarity assessment tools.

Carol F Kirchhoff, Xiao-Zhuo Michelle Wang, Hugh D Conlon, Scott Anderson, Anne M Ryan, Arindam Bose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Switching from One Biosimilar to Another Biosimilar of the Same Reference Biologic: A Systematic Review of Studies.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Comparing the pharmacokinetics of adalimumab originator and biosimilar product in patients with Inflammatory bowel disease or autoimmune disease.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carol F KirchhoffPfizer Inc, Global Technology Services, Biotechnology and Aseptic Sciences Group, Chesterfield, Missouri.
Xiao-Zhuo Michelle WangPfizer Inc, BioTherapeutics Pharmaceutical Sciences, Pearl River, New York.
Hugh D ConlonPfizer Inc, Analytical Research and Development, Andover, Massachusetts.
Scott AndersonPfizer Inc, Worldwide Regulatory, San Diego, California.
Anne M RyanPfizer Inc, Drug Safety Research and Development, Groton, Connecticut.
Arindam BosePfizer Inc, BioTherapeutics Pharmaceutical Sciences, Groton, Connecticut.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A biosimilar drug is defined in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance document as a biopharmaceutical that is highly similar to an already licensed biologic product (referred to as the reference product) notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences in purity, potency, and safety between the two products. The development of biosimilars is a challenging, multistep process. Typically, the assessment of similarity involves comprehensive structural and functional characterization throughout the development of the biosimilar in an iterative manner and, if required by the local regulatory authority, an in vivo nonclinical evaluation, all conducted with direct comparison to the reference product. In addition, comparative clinical pharmacology studies are conducted with the reference product. The approval of biosimilars is highly regulated although varied across the globe in terms of nomenclature and the precise criteria for demonstrating similarity. Despite varied regulatory requirements, differences between the proposed biosimilar and the reference product must be supported by strong scientific evidence that these differences are not clinically meaningful. This review discusses the challenges faced by pharmaceutical companies in the development of biosimilars.

Indexed as

Government RegulationBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug ApprovalDrug IndustryLegislation, DrugUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsanalytical characterizationbiologicbiosimilardevelopmentmanufacturingregulatory requirements

Identifiers

PMID28842986
PMCPMC5698755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.