Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842943›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neurobiology2017

To mdivi-1 or not to mdivi-1: Is that the question?

George Smith, Gianluca Gallo

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neurobiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
80citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

80 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DRP1 depletion protects NK cells from hypoxia-induced dysfunction.Redox report : communications in free radical research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of oral microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

George SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, 3500 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.
Gianluca GalloDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Shriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, 3500 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140.ORCID 0000-0002-0777-379X
American Institute of Biological Sciences · US

Funding

Mechanism and function of the fission of axonal mitochondriaR01NS095471 · NINDS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI GALLO, GIANLUCA · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS095471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fission/division and fusion of mitochondria are fundamental aspects of mitochondrial biology. The balance of fission and fusion sets the length of mitochondria in cells to serve their physiological requirements. The fission of mitochondria is markedly induced in many disease states and in response to cellular injury, resulting in the fragmentation of mitochondria into dysfunctional units. The mechanism that drives fission is dependent on the dynamin related protein 1 (Drp1) GTPase. mdivi-1 is a quinazolinone originally described as a selective inhibitor of Drp1, over other dynamin family members, and reported to inhibit mitochondrial fission. A recent study has challenged the activity of mdivi-1 as an inhibitor of Drp1. This study raises serious issues regarding the interpretation of data addressing the effects of mdivi-1 as reflective of the inhibition of Drp1 and thus fission. This commentary considers the evidence for and against mdivi-1 as an inhibitor of Drp1 and presents the following considerations; (1) the activity of mdivi-1 toward Drp1 GTPase activity requires further biochemical investigation, (2) as there is a large body of literature using mdivi-1 in vitro with effects as predicted for inhibition of Drp1 and mitochondrial fission, reviewed herein, the evidence is in favor of mdivi-1's originally described bioactivity, and (3) until the issue is resolved, experimental interpretations for the effects of mdivi-1 on inhibition of fission in cell and tissue experiments warrants stringent positive controls directly addressing the effects of mdivi-1 on fission. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 77: 1260-1268, 2017.

Indexed as

AnimalsEnzyme InhibitorsGTP PhosphohydrolasesHumansMitochondriaMitochondrial DynamicsQuinazolinones3-(2,4-dichloro-5-methoxyphenyl)-2-sulfanyl-4(3H)-quinazolinoneEnzyme InhibitorsGTP PhosphohydrolasesQuinazolinonesdivisionfissionfusionmitochondria

Identifiers

PMID28842943
PMCPMC5654677
OpenAlexW2750080731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.