Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842940›Full record

ArticlePest management science2018

The impact of restrictions on neonicotinoid and fipronil insecticides on pest management in maize, oilseed rape and sunflower in eight European Union regions.

Jonas Kathage, Pedro Castañera, José Luis Alonso-Prados, Manuel Gómez-Barbero, Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Allium cepa test vs. insecticides: a scientometric and meta-analytical review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Interaction of Insecticides and Fungicides in Bees.Frontiers in insect science · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The potential of the solitary parasitoidEntomologia experimentalis et applicata · 2020
    Article
  18. Neonicotinoids: Spreading, Translocation and Aquatic Toxicity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonas KathageEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Economics of Agriculture Unit, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9096-0413
Pedro CastañeraSpanish National Research Council (CSIC), Biological Research Center (CIB), Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Alonso-PradosNational Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology (INIA), DTEVPF, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Gómez-BarberoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Economics of Agriculture Unit, Seville, Spain.
Emilio Rodríguez-CerezoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Directorate for Sustainable Resources, Economics of Agriculture Unit, Seville, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2013, the European Commission restricted the use of three neonicotinoids (clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam) and the pyrazole fipronil, which are widely used to control early-season pests. Here, we used original farm survey data to examine the impact of the restrictions on pest management practices in eight regional case studies including maize, oilseed rape and sunflower in seven European Union (EU) countries.

resultsIn four case studies, farmers switched to using untreated seeds as no alternative seed treatments were available. In three case studies, farmers switched to using unrestricted neonicotinoid- or pyrethroid-treated seeds. In five case studies, farmers increased the use of soil or foliar treatments, with pyrethroids as the principal insecticide class. Other changes in pest management practices ranged from increased sowing density to more frequent scouting for pests. Many farmers perceived that the time, cost and amount of insecticides required to protect crops increased, along with pest pressure. Alternative seed treatments were mostly perceived as being less effective than the restricted seed treatments.

conclusionFarmers generally relied on alternative seed treatments or more soil/foliar treatments in the first growing season after the restrictions took effect. Further study is required to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of these alternatives compared with the restricted insecticides. © 2017 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

European UnionInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPyrazolesBrassica napusHelianthusInsect ControlZea maysfipronilInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsPyrazolesclothianidinfipronilimidaclopridinsecticidesneonicotinoidsthiamethoxam

Identifiers

PMID28842940
PMCPMC5765491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.