Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842808›Full record

ArticleCell stress & chaperones2018

Evaluation of DNA methylation and mRNA expression of heat shock proteins in thermal manipulated chicken.

A Vinoth, T Thirunalasundari, M Shanmugam, A Uthrakumar, S Suji, U Rajkumar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

A VinothDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, Bharathidhasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, 620 024, India.
T ThirunalasundariDepartment of Industrial Biotechnology, Bharathidhasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, 620 024, India.
M ShanmugamICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 030, India.
A UthrakumarTamilnadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
S SujiM.S. Swaminathan Research Institute, Taramani, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
U RajkumarICAR-Directorate of Poultry Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 030, India. ullengala@yahoo.com.
Bharathidasan University · INDirectorate of Poultry Research · INM S Swaminathan Research Foundation · INTamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thermal manipulation during embryogenesis has been demonstrated to enhance the thermotolerance capacity of broilers through epigenetic modifications. Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are induced in response to stress for guarding cells against damage. The present study investigates the effect of thermal conditioning during embryogenesis and thermal challenge at 42 days of age on HSP gene and protein expression, DNA methylation and in vitro luciferase assay in brain tissue of Naked Neck (NN) and Punjab Broiler-2 (PB-2) chicken. On the 15th day of incubation, fertile eggs from two breeds, NN and PB-2, were randomly divided in to two groups: control (C)-eggs were incubated under standard incubation conditions, and thermal conditioning (TC)-eggs were exposed to higher incubation temperature (40.5°C) for 3 h on the 15th, 16th, and 17th days of incubation. The chicks obtained from each group were further subdivided and reared under different environmental conditions from the 15th to the 42nd day as normal [N; 25 ± 1 °C, 70% relative humidity (RH)] and heat exposed (HE; 35 ± 1 °C, 50% RH) resulting in four treatment groups (CN, CHE, TCN, and TCHE). The results revealed that HSP promoter activity was stronger in CHE, which had lesser methylation and higher gene expression. The activity of promoter region was lesser in TCHE birds that were thermally manipulated at the embryonic stage, thus reflecting their stress-free condition. This was confirmed by the lower level of mRNA expression of all the HSP genes. In conclusion, thermal conditioning during embryogenesis has a positive impact and improves chicken thermotolerance capacity in postnatal life.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsBody WeightBrainChick EmbryoChickensDNA MethylationHeat-Shock ProteinsHeat-Shock ResponseHormonesLuciferasesPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, MessengerHeat-Shock ProteinsHormonesLuciferasesRNA, MessengerBrainEmbryoEpigeneticsHeat shock proteinsMethylation

Identifiers

PMID28842808
PMCPMC5823805
OpenAlexW2748742677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.