Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842787›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2017

What are the Mechanisms Behind a Parasite-Induced Decline in Nestmate Recognition in Ants?

Sara Beros, Susanne Foitzik, Florian Menzel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara BerosInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Department of Behavioral Ecology and Social Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes-von-Mueller Weg 6, 55128, Mainz, Germany. beross@uni-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-8019
Susanne FoitzikInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Department of Behavioral Ecology and Social Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes-von-Mueller Weg 6, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Florian MenzelInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Department of Behavioral Ecology and Social Evolution, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Johannes-von-Mueller Weg 6, 55128, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft FO 298/15-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DE) ME 2842/3-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social insects have developed sophisticated recognition skills to defend their nests against intruders. They do this by aggressively discriminating against non-nestmates with deviant cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) signatures. Studying nestmate recognition can be challenging as individual insects do not only vary in their discriminatory abilities, but also in their motivation to behave aggressively. To disentangle the influence of signaling and behavioral motivation on nestmate recognition, we investigated the ant Temnothorax nylanderi, where the presence of tapeworm-infected nestmates leads to reduced nestmate recognition among uninfected workers. The parasite-induced decline in nestmate recognition could be caused by higher intra-colonial cue diversity as tapeworm-infected workers are known to exhibit a modified hydrocarbon signature. This in turn may broaden the neuronal template of their nestmates, leading to a higher tolerance towards alien conspecifics. To test this hypothesis, we exchanged infected ants between colonies and analyzed their impact on CHC profiles of uninfected workers. We demonstrate that despite frequent grooming, which should promote the transfer of recognition cues, CHC profiles of uninfected workers neither changed in the presence of tapeworm-infected ants, nor did it increase cue diversity among uninfected nestmates within or between colonies. However, CHC profiles were systematically affected by the removal of nestmates and addition of non-nestmates, independently from the ants' infection status. For example, when non-nestmates were present workers expressed more dimethyl alkanes and higher overall CHC quantities, possibly to achieve a better distinction from non-nestmates. Workers showed clear task-specific profiles with tapeworm-infected workers resembling more closely young nurses than older foragers. Our results show that the parasite-induced decline in nestmate recognition is not due to increased recognition cue diversity or altered CHC profiles of uninfected workers, but behavioral changes might explain tolerance towards intruders.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsNesting BehaviorAnimalsAntsBehavior, AnimalHydrocarbonsPlatyhelminthsSocial BehaviorHydrocarbonsCuticular hydrocarbonsFormicidaeNestmate recognitionParasite-induced changesSociobiologyTapewormTemnothorax nylanderi

Identifiers

PMID28842787
OpenAlexW2750260518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.