Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842753›Full record

ArticleDer Pathologe2017

[Autopsy rates in Germany].

M Grassow-Narlik, M Wessolly, J Friemann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Pathologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Minimally invasive autopsies-Methods and limitations].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Implementation of post-mortem examinations within a large population-based cohort: results from the Hamburg City Health Study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Legal and organizational aspects of autopsy in Germany].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Dusseldorf autopsies 1914-1918.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [COVID-19-associated deaths].Rechtsmedizin (Berlin, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Post-Mortem Examination as a Quality Improvement Instrument.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Grassow-NarlikBundesverband Deutscher Pathologen e.V., Robert-Koch-Platz 9, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland. bv@pathologie.de.
M WessollyInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Deutschland. michael.wessolly@uk-essen.de.
J FriemannInstitut für Pathologie, Märkische Kliniken GmbH, Klinikum Lüdenscheid, Paulmannshöher Str. 14, 58515, Lüdenscheid, Deutschland. johannes.friemann@klinikum-luedenscheid.de.
Berufsverband der Deutschen Dermatologen · DEEssen University Hospital · DEKlinikum Lüdenscheid · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015 the German professional Association of Pathologists conducted a survey to establish a baseline for an autopsy rate in Germany and to collect data from 2005-2014, as hospitals must meet a fixed autopsy quota to receive the supplementary payment for autopsies as stated in the law for hospital structure (KHSG 10.12.2015). MATERIAL AND

methodsThe survey comprised 12 questions and was sent to 450 institutes of pathology. The overall return rate was 38%. The data of the different institutional types was grouped and statistically analyzed.

resultsOf 86.416 reported autopsies on deceased adults in Germany from 2005-2014, 47% took place in university hospitals, 36% in local hospitals and 17% in privately run practices. Out of 4320 autopsies on deceased children and adolescents, the majority (83%) were performed at university hospitals, 8%, and 9%, respectively, at the other two entity types. Of the 14.047 fetal autopsies, 55% were done at university hospitals, 25% at other hospitals and 20% at private practices. From 2005 to 2014 the overall number of autopsies decreased by 30%, independently of the institute type. Within each group of institution types there was a wide range in numbers and rate of autopsies done per year: university hospitals total 0‑428, quota of 3,4-19,4%; local hospitals 0‑324, quota of 1,1-30,8%; private practices 0‑268, quota 0,4-5,2%.

conclusionTo this day, there is no universal system to document and register hospital autopsy rates in Germany. Due to the high range of yearly autopsy rates even within the different groups of institute types, the threshold for the autopsy rate that must be met to obtain the supplementary payment should be low in the beginning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAutopsyChildFemaleFetusGermanyHospitalsHospitals, UniversityHumansPathology Department, HospitalPregnancyPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAcademic hospitalsAutopsy rateFetal autopsiesHospital institutionsPrivate practices

Identifiers

PMID28842753
OpenAlexW2745912297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.