Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28842218›Full record

Observational studyJournal of pain and symptom management2018

Does Modality Matter? Palliative Care Unit Associated With More Cost-Avoidance Than Consultations.

Peter May, Melissa M Garrido, Egidio Del Fabbro, Danielle Noreika, Charles Normand, Nevena Skoro, J Brian Cassel

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A supportive care dedicated hospitalization ward in comprehensive cancer center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter MayTrinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Melissa M GarridoJames J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Egidio Del FabbroVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Danielle NoreikaVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Charles NormandTrinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Nevena SkoroVirginia Commonwealth University Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
J Brian CasselVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA. Electronic address: brian.cassel@vcuhealth.org.

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Kim Felder Rhoads · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
Impact of Mental Illness on Veterans' Palliative Care Access and OutcomesIK2HX000767 · VA · JAMES J PETERS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI GARRIDO, MELISSA M · 2014 to 2015
–
HSRD VA CDP 12-255HSRD VA IK2 HX000767NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextInpatient palliative care (PC) is associated with reduced costs, but the optimal model for providing inpatient PC is unknown.

objectivesTo estimate the effect of palliative care consultations (PCCs) and care in a palliative care unit (PCU) on cost of care, in comparison with usual care (UC) only and in comparison with each other.

methodsRetrospective cohort study, using multinomial propensity scoring to control for observed confounding between treatment groups. Participants were adults admitted as inpatients between 2009 and 2015, with at least one of seven life-limiting conditions who died within a year of admission (N = 6761).

resultsPC within 10 days of admission is estimated to reduce costs compared with UC in the case of both PCU (-$6333; 95% CI: -7871 to -4795; P < 0.001) and PCC (-$3559; 95% CI: -5732 to -1387; P < 0.001). PCU is estimated to reduce costs compared with PCC (-$2774; 95% CI: -5107 to -441; P = 0.02) and length of stay compared with UC (-1.5 days; -2.2 to -0.9; P < 0.001). The comparatively larger effect of PCU over PCC is not observable when the treatment groups are restricted to those who received PC early in their admission (within six days).

conclusionBoth PCU and PCC are associated with lower hospital costs than UC. PCU is associated with a greater cost-avoidance effect than PCC, except where both interventions are provided early in the hospitalization. Both timely provision of PC for appropriate patients and creation of more PCUs may decrease hospital costs.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareReferral and ConsultationRetrospective Studiescohort studycost of careeconomicshospitalsPalliative care

Identifiers

PMID28842218
PMCPMC5860672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.