Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841892›Full record

Trial reportThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2017

The impact of financial incentives on participants' food purchasing patterns in a supermarket-based randomized controlled trial.

Dana Lee Olstad, David A Crawford, Gavin Abbott, Sarah A McNaughton, Ha Nd Le, Cliona Ni Mhurchu, Christina Pollard, Kylie Ball

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeted retail coupons influence category-level food purchases over 2-years.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dana Lee OlstadDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 4Z6, Canada. dana.olstad@ucalgary.ca.
David A CrawfordDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
Gavin AbbottDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
Sarah A McNaughtonDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, 3220, Australia.
Ha Nd LeDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Deakin Health Economics, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.
Cliona Ni MhurchuNational Institute for Health Innovation, School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland Mail Centre, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand.
Christina PollardSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Sciences, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia, 6845, Australia.
Kylie BallDeakin University, Geelong, Australia, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Locked Bag 20000, Geelong, 3220, Australia.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe impacts of supermarket-based nutrition promotion interventions might be overestimated if participants shift their proportionate food purchasing away from their usual stores. This study quantified whether participants who received price discounts on fruits and vegetables (FV) in the Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf) randomized controlled trial (RCT) shifted their FV purchasing into study supermarkets during the intervention period.

methodsParticipants were 642 females randomly assigned to a 1) skill-building (n = 160), 2) price reduction (n = 161), 3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 160), or 4) control (n = 161) group. Participants self-reported the proportion of FV purchased in study supermarkets at baseline, 3- and 6-months post-intervention. Fisher's exact and χ

resultsPost-intervention, 49% of participants purchased ≥50% of their FV in study supermarkets. Compared to all other groups, the price reduction group was approximately twice as likely (RRR: 1.8-2.2) to have increased proportionate purchasing of FV in study supermarkets from baseline to post-intervention (p< 0.05).

conclusionsParticipants who received price reductions on FV were approximately twice as likely to shift their FV purchasing from other stores into study supermarkets during the intervention period. Unless food purchasing data are available for all sources, differential changes in purchasing patterns can make it difficult to discern the true impacts of nutrition interventions.

trial registrationThe SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901, Registered 30 June 2010, Retrospectively registered ( http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN39432901 ).

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultChoice BehaviorCommerceConsumer BehaviorDiet, HealthyFemaleFood PreferencesFruitHealth PromotionHumansMiddle AgedSelf ReportVegetablesYoung AdultFood purchasingFruits and vegetablesPrice reductionsRandomized controlled trialSupermarket

Identifiers

PMID28841892
PMCPMC5574131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.