Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841876›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2017

Specific entrustable professional activities for undergraduate medical internships: a method compatible with the academic curriculum.

Alicia Hamui-Sutton, Ana María Monterrosas-Rojas, Armando Ortiz-Montalvo, Felipe Flores-Morones, Uri Torruco-García, Andrea Navarrete-Martínez, Araceli Arrioja-Guerrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alicia Hamui-SuttonMedical Education Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Edificio B, 3er piso, Zip code, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico. lizhamui@gmail.com.
Ana María Monterrosas-RojasMedical Internship Department, Clinical Teaching Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Armando Ortiz-MontalvoMedical Education Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Edificio B, 3er piso, Zip code, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico.
Felipe Flores-MoronesMedical Internship Department, Clinical Teaching Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Uri Torruco-GarcíaMedical Education Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Facultad de Medicina, Edificio B, 3er piso, Zip code, 04510, Coyoacán, Mexico.
Andrea Navarrete-MartínezMedical Internship Department, Clinical Teaching Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Araceli Arrioja-GuerreroMedical Internship Department, Clinical Teaching Secretary, Medicine School, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompetency-based education has been considered the most important pedagogical trend in Medicine in the last two decades. In clinical contexts, competencies are implemented through Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) which are observable and measurable. The aim of this paper is to describe the methodology used in the design of educational tools to assess students´ competencies in clinical practice during their undergraduate internship (UI). In this paper, we present the construction of specific APROCs (Actividades Profesionales Confiables) in Surgery (S), Gynecology and Obstetrics (GO) and Family Medicine (FM) rotations with three levels of performance.

methodsThe study considered a mixed method exploratory type design, a qualitative phase followed by a quantitative validation exercise. In the first stage data was obtained from three rotations (FM, GO and S) through focus groups about real and expected activities of medical interns. Triangulation with other sources was made to construct benchmarks. In the second stage, narrative descriptions with the three levels were validated by professors who teach the different subjects using the Delphi technique.

resultsThe results may be described both curricular and methodological wise. From the curricular point of view, APROCs were identified in three UI rotations within clinical contexts in Mexico City, benchmarks were developed by levels and validated by experts' consensus. In regard to methodological issues, this research contributed to the development of a strategy, following six steps, to build APROCs using mixed methods.

conclusionsDeveloping benchmarks provides a regular and standardized language that helps to evaluate student's performance and define educational strategies efficiently and accurately. The university academic program was aligned with APROCs in clinical contexts to assure the acquisition of competencies by students.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateInternship and ResidencyClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumDelphi TechniqueEducational MeasurementHumansAcademic curriculumBenchmarksDelphi techniqueEntrustable professional activitiesFocus groupsRotationsUndergraduate internship

Identifiers

PMID28841876
PMCPMC5574123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.