Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841753›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Material practices for meaningful engagement: An analysis of participatory learning and action research techniques for data generation and analysis in a health research partnership.

Mary O'Reilly-de Brún, Tomas de Brún, Catherine A O'Donnell, Maria Papadakaki, Aristoula Saridaki, Christos Lionis, Nicola Burns, Chris Dowrick, Katja Gravenhorst, Wolfgang Spiegel and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Refugee and migrants' involvement in participatory spaces in a US practice-based research network study: Responding to unanticipated priorities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Time Moving exhibit: Exploring perceptions of time in end-of-life experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Mary O'Reilly-de BrúnDiscipline of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Tomas de BrúnDiscipline of General Practice, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Catherine A O'DonnellGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Maria PapadakakiClinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Aristoula SaridakiClinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Christos LionisClinic of Social and Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.
Nicola BurnsGeneral Practice and Primary Care, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Chris DowrickUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Katja GravenhorstUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Wolfgang SpiegelCentre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Chris Van WeelDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Evelyn Van Weel-BaumgartenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Maria Van den MuijsenberghDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands.
Anne MacFarlaneGraduate Entry Medical School and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-5025

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe material practices which researchers use in research partnerships may enable or constrain the nature of engagement with stakeholder groups. Participatory learning and action (PLA) research approaches show promise, but there has been no detailed analysis of stakeholders' and researchers' experiences of PLA techniques for data generation and co-analysis.

objectivesTo explore stakeholders' and researchers' experiences of PLA techniques for data generation and co-analysis.

designThe EU RESTORE implementation science project employed a participatory approach to investigate and support the implementation of guidelines and training initiatives (GTIs) to enhance communication in cross-cultural primary care consultations. We developed a purposeful sample of 78 stakeholders (migrants, general practice staff, community interpreters, service providers, service planners) from primary care settings in Austria, England, Greece, Ireland and The Netherlands. We used speed evaluations and participatory evaluations to explore their experiences of two PLA techniques-Commentary Charts and Direct Ranking-which were intended to generate data for co-analysis by stakeholders about the GTIs under analysis. We evaluated 16 RESTORE researchers' experiences using interviews. We conducted thematic and content analysis of all evaluation data.

resultsPLA Commentary Charts and Direct Ranking techniques, with their visual, verbal and tangible nature and inherent analytical capabilities, were found to be powerful tools for involving stakeholders in a collaborative analysis of GTIs. Stakeholders had few negative experiences and numerous multifaceted positive experiences of meaningful engagement, which resonated with researchers' accounts.

conclusionPLA techniques and approaches are valuable as material practices in health research partnerships.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCooperative BehaviorCulturally Competent CarePrimary Health CareResearch DesignCommunicationEuropean UnionGlobal HealthHealth Services ResearchHumansTransients and Migrantshealth research partnershipsmigrant healthparticipatory researchpublic and patient involvement

Identifiers

PMID28841753
PMCPMC5750692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.