Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841650›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Transparency ethics in practice: Revisiting financial conflicts of interest disclosure forms in clinical practice guidelines.

Yidan Lu, Derek J Jones, Nour Sharara, Tonya Kaltenbach, Loren Laine, Kenneth McQuaid, Roy Soetikno, Venkataraman Subramanian, Alan Barkun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yidan LuDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0353-4687
Derek J JonesFaculty of Law, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nour ShararaDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tonya KaltenbachDivision of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, Unites States of America.
Loren LaineSection of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, Unites States of America.
Kenneth McQuaidDivision of Gastroenterology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, Unites States of America.
Roy SoetiknoDivision of Gastroenterology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, Palo Alto, California, Unites States of America.
Venkataraman SubramanianDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Alan BarkunDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University Health Centre · CASan Francisco VA Medical Center · USMcGill University · CAUniversity of Leeds · GBVA Palo Alto Health Care System · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAuthors of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) disclose financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) to promote transparency ethics. Typically, they do so on standard declaration forms containing generic open-ended questions on FCOIs. Yet, the literature is scant on the format and effect of alternative disclosure forms. Does supplementing a standard form with subsequent detailed disclosure forms tailored to the context of the CPG improve the yield or accuracy of FCOIs declarations?

methodsFor an international CPG in gastroenterology on the endoscopic surveillance for colorectal neoplasia in inflammatory bowel disease, we compared the use of a standard FCOIs disclosure form with a contextual FCOIs disclosure form that detailed commercial relations related to the CPG topic. This included manufacturers of endoscopes, endoscopy equipment and accessories. Participants completed the generic form early, and the supplementary contextual form six months later. We then compared the FCOI disclosures obtained.

findings26 participants provided FCOIs disclosures using both disclosure forms. We found discrepancies regarding (1) the disclosure of FCOIs (presence/absence), and (2) the listing of financial entities. While the number of participants who disclosed a FCOI remained the same (30.8%) using the two forms, disclosures were not from the same individuals: two additional participants disclosed a FCOI, whereas two participants withdrew previous disclosures. Among those who reported a FCOI in either form, we noted inconsistencies in disclosures for 70% of the participants. This included changes in FCOIs disclosure status or modifications of "their commercial relations". DISCUSSION: Accurate reporting of FCOIs advances the transparency and ethical integrity of CPGs. Our experience suggests that a contextual FCOIs disclosure form tailored to content of the CPG with narrow, detailed questions provides supplementary, more complete FCOIs declarations than generic forms alone. The finding raises challenges on how forms are best written and formatted, optimally timed, and more effectively processed with sensitivity to professional behaviour, so as to heighten transparency.

Indexed as

Conflict of InterestEthics, ProfessionalFinancial ManagementPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28841650
PMCPMC5571907
OpenAlexW2747788203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.