Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841641›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2017

Noise correlations in the human brain and their impact on pattern classification.

Vikranth R Bejjanki, Rava Azeredo da Silveira, Jonathan D Cohen, Nicholas B Turk-Browne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural spiking for causal inference and learning.PLoS computational biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vikranth R BejjankiDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7176-3636
Rava Azeredo da SilveiraPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Jonathan D CohenDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.
Nicholas B Turk-BrowneDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Neural and Behavioral Interactions Between Attention, Perception, and LearningR01EY021755 · NEI · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI TURK-BROWNE, NICHOLAS BENJAMIN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate decoding methods, such as multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA), are highly effective at extracting information from brain imaging data. Yet, the precise nature of the information that MVPA draws upon remains controversial. Most current theories emphasize the enhanced sensitivity imparted by aggregating across voxels that have mixed and weak selectivity. However, beyond the selectivity of individual voxels, neural variability is correlated across voxels, and such noise correlations may contribute importantly to accurate decoding. Indeed, a recent computational theory proposed that noise correlations enhance multivariate decoding from heterogeneous neural populations. Here we extend this theory from the scale of neurons to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and show that noise correlations between heterogeneous populations of voxels (i.e., voxels selective for different stimulus variables) contribute to the success of MVPA. Specifically, decoding performance is enhanced when voxels with high vs. low noise correlations (measured during rest or in the background of the task) are selected during classifier training. Conversely, voxels that are strongly selective for one class in a GLM or that receive high classification weights in MVPA tend to exhibit high noise correlations with voxels selective for the other class being discriminated against. Furthermore, we use simulations to show that this is a general property of fMRI data and that selectivity and noise correlations can have distinguishable influences on decoding. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that if there is signal in the data, the resulting above-chance classification accuracy is modulated by the magnitude of noise correlations.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdultAlgorithmsAttentionBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuronsPattern Recognition, Physiological

Identifiers

PMID28841641
PMCPMC5589258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.