ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Noise correlations in the human brain and their impact on pattern classification.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- DeepCor: denoising fMRI data with contrastive autoencoders.Nature methods · 2026Article
- Complementary benefits of multivariate and hierarchical models for identifying individual differences in cognitive control.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Task relevant autoencoding enhances machine learning for human neuroscience.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Complementary benefits of multivariate and hierarchical models for identifying individual differences in cognitive control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Perception and memory retrieval states are reflected in distributed patterns of background functional connectivity.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Neural spiking for causal inference and learning.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Optimizing cognitive neuroscience experiments for separating event- related fMRI BOLD responses in non-randomized alternating designs.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2023Article
- The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control Project.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2021Article
- Age differences in Neural Activation to Face Trustworthiness: Voxel Pattern and Activation Level Assessments.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Understanding multivariate brain activity: Evaluating the effect of voxelwise noise correlations on population codes in functional magnetic resonance imaging.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Multivoxel Pattern of Blood Oxygen Level Dependent Activity can be sensitive to stimulus specific fine scale responses.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Three-stage processing of category and variation information by entangled interactive mechanisms of peri-occipital and peri-frontal cortices.Scientific reports · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multivariate decoding methods, such as multivoxel pattern analysis (MVPA), are highly effective at extracting information from brain imaging data. Yet, the precise nature of the information that MVPA draws upon remains controversial. Most current theories emphasize the enhanced sensitivity imparted by aggregating across voxels that have mixed and weak selectivity. However, beyond the selectivity of individual voxels, neural variability is correlated across voxels, and such noise correlations may contribute importantly to accurate decoding. Indeed, a recent computational theory proposed that noise correlations enhance multivariate decoding from heterogeneous neural populations. Here we extend this theory from the scale of neurons to functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and show that noise correlations between heterogeneous populations of voxels (i.e., voxels selective for different stimulus variables) contribute to the success of MVPA. Specifically, decoding performance is enhanced when voxels with high vs. low noise correlations (measured during rest or in the background of the task) are selected during classifier training. Conversely, voxels that are strongly selective for one class in a GLM or that receive high classification weights in MVPA tend to exhibit high noise correlations with voxels selective for the other class being discriminated against. Furthermore, we use simulations to show that this is a general property of fMRI data and that selectivity and noise correlations can have distinguishable influences on decoding. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that if there is signal in the data, the resulting above-chance classification accuracy is modulated by the magnitude of noise correlations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.