ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2017
Intelligence and Academic Achievement of Adolescents with Craniofacial Microsomia.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Academic achievement and needs of school-aged children born with selected congenital anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Birth defects research · 2021Pooled it
- Establishing an International Interdisciplinary Research Network in Craniofacial Microsomia: The CARE Program.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024Article
- School participation among young people with craniofacial microsomia and other childhood-onset disabilities.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2024Article
- Caregiver strategies supporting community participation among children and youth with or at risk for disabilities: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Natural Language Processing to Classify Caregiver Strategies Supporting Participation Among Children and Youth with Craniofacial Microsomia and Other Childhood-Onset Disabilities.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Ultrasound measurements of fetal facial profile markers and their associations with congenital malformations during early pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Psychosocial and Health-Related Experiences of Individuals With Microtia and Craniofacial Microsomia and Their Families: Narrative Review Over 2 Decades.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2023Review
- Community participation in youth with craniofacial microsomia.Disability and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Cognitive, Motor, and Language Development of Preschool Children With Craniofacial Microsomia.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2021Article
- [Obstructive sleep apnea in microtia children with maxillofacial dysostosis].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2021Review
- Behavioral Adjustment of Preschool Children With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2021Article
- Speech, Language, and Communication Skills of Adolescents With Craniofacial Microsomia.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- Methods and Challenges in a Cohort Study of Infants and Toddlers With Craniofacial Microsomia: The Clock Study.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2019Article
- In Their Own Words: Caregiver and Patient Perspectives on Stressors, Resources, and Recommendations in Craniofacial Microsomia Care.The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2018Article
- Neurodevelopment of Infants with and without Craniofacial Microsomia.The Journal of pediatrics · 2018Observational
- Parental Reports of Intervention Services and Prevalence of Teasing in a Multinational Craniofacial Microsomia Pediatric Study.The Journal of craniofacial surgeryArticle
- Caregiver Perspectives on School Participation Among Students With Craniofacial Microsomia.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe authors compared the IQ and academic achievement of adolescents with craniofacial microsomia (cases) and unaffected children (controls). Among cases, the authors analyzed cognitive functioning by facial phenotype.
methodsThe authors administered standardized tests of intelligence, reading, spelling, writing, and mathematics to 142 cases and 316 controls recruited from 26 cities across the United States and Canada. Phenotypic classification was based on integrated data from photographic images, health history, and medical chart reviews. Hearing screens were conducted for all participants.
resultsAfter adjustment for demographics, cases' average scores were lower than those of controls on all measures, but the magnitude of differences was small (standardized effect sizes, -0.01 to -0.3). There was little evidence that hearing status modified case-control group differences (Wald p > 0.05 for all measures). Twenty-five percent of controls and 38 percent of cases were classified as having learning problems (adjusted OR, 1.5; 95 percent CI, 0.9 to 2.4). Comparison of cases with and without learning problems indicated that those with learning problems were more likely to be male, Hispanic, and to come from lower income, bilingual families. Analyses by facial phenotype showed that case-control group differences were largest for cases with both microtia and mandibular hypoplasia (effect sizes, -0.02 to -0.6).
conclusionsThe highest risk of cognitive-academic problems was observed in patients with combined microtia and mandibular hypoplasia. Developmental surveillance of this subgroup is recommended, especially in the context of high socioeconomic risk and bilingual families. Given the early stage of research on craniofacial microsomia and neurodevelopment, replication of these findings is needed. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.