Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841509›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2017

Exploring online communication about cigarette smoking among Twitter users who self-identify as having schizophrenia.

Yulin Hswen, John A Naslund, Pooja Chandrashekar, Robert Siegel, John S Brownstein, Jared B Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yulin HswenDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: yuh958@mail.harvard.edu.
John A NaslundThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Electronic address: john.a.naslund@dartmouth.edu.
Pooja ChandrashekarHarvard College, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: pchandrashekar@college.harvard.edu.
Robert SiegelOlin College, Needham, MA, USA. Electronic address: Robert.Siegel@students.olin.edu.
John S BrownsteinInformatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: John.Brownstein@childrens.harvard.edu.
Jared B HawkinsInformatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: Jared.Hawkins@childrens.harvard.edu.
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USFranklin W. Olin College of Engineering · USHarvard College Observatory · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING-MEDICAL INFORMATICS 90T15LM007092 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI Nils Gehlenborg · 1992 to 2026
$32.8M
Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
A Platform for Modeling the Global Impact of Climate Change on Infectious DiseaseR01LM010812 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BROWNSTEIN, JOHN S. · 2010 to 2015
$2.5M
An Approach for Estimating Foodborne Illnesses and Assessing Risk FactorsR01LM011965 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BROWNSTEIN, JOHN S., NSOESIE, ELAINE O. · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
CIHR 140387NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010812NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011965NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Novel approaches are needed to address elevated tobacco use among people with schizophrenia. This exploratory study examined the frequency, timing, and type of communication about tobacco-related content on Twitter among users who self-identify as having schizophrenia compared with users from the general population. Over a 200-day period from January to July 2016, Twitter users who self-identify as having a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (n = 203) and a randomly selected group of general population control users (n = 173) posted 1,544,122 tweets. Communication frequency did not differ between groups. Tweets containing tobacco-related keywords were extracted. Twitter users with schizophrenia posted significantly more tweets containing any tobacco-related terms (mean = 3.74; SD = 16.3) compared with control users (mean = 0.82; SD = 1.8). A significantly greater proportion of Twitter users with schizophrenia (45%; n = 92) posted tweets containing any tobacco terms compared with control users (30%; n = 52). Schizophrenia users showed significantly greater odds of tweeting about tobacco compared with control users (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.29-3.07). These findings suggest that online communication about tobacco may parallel real world trends of elevated tobacco use observed among people with schizophrenia. By showing that Twitter users who self-identify as having schizophrenia discuss tobacco-related content online, popular social media could inform smoking cessation efforts targeting this at-risk group.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingCommunicationSchizophrenic PsychologySocial MediaCase-Control StudiesDiagnostic Self EvaluationFemaleHumansMaleSchizophreniaSmokingTime FactorsCigaretteMental illnessSchizophreniaSmokingSocial mediaTobaccoTwitter

Identifiers

PMID28841509
PMCPMC5877400
OpenAlexW2739753986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.