Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28841236›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Phase 1 dose escalation multicenter trial of pracinostat alone and in combination with azacitidine in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies.

Yasmin M Abaza, Tapan M Kadia, Elias J Jabbour, Marina Y Konopleva, Gautam Borthakur, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Zeev Estrov, William G Wierda, Ana Alfonso, Toh Han Chong and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Epigenetic Targeting in Myeloid Malignancies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Epigenetics-targeted drugs: current paradigms and future challenges.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  8. What nature has to offer: Opportunities for immuno-oncology.Journal of food and drug analysis · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yasmin M AbazaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-7912
Tapan M KadiaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-9832
Elias J JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Marina Y KonoplevaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gautam BorthakurDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Alessandra FerrajoliDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Zeev EstrovDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
William G WierdaDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Ana AlfonsoDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Toh Han ChongDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Charles ChuahCancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Liang-Piu KohDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Boon-Cher GohDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Julie E ChangDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Wisconsin Paul B. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin.
Daniel E DurkesMEI Pharma Inc, San Diego, California.
Maria Cielo FoudrayDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Xiao Qin DongDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Guillermo Garcia-ManeroDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGMEI Pharma (United States) · USNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SGUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPracinostat is a potent histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity in both solid tumor and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Pracinostat is reported to have modest clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Given the higher preclinical sensitivity of hematologic malignancies to pracinostat, the authors conducted a phase 1 study to assess the safety, maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pracinostat in patients with advanced hematological malignancies.

methodsPracinostat was administered orally 3 times a week for 3 weeks on a 28-day cycle. Patients were assigned to 7 dose levels using a 3 + 3 dose escalation design.

resultsA total of 44 patients were enrolled, 25 of whom had AML and 14 of whom had myelodysplastic syndrome. The maximum tolerated dose was 120 mg and the recommended phase 2 dose was 60 mg. Two patients with AML achieved a response: 1 complete remission (CR) and 1 complete cytogenetic response. Despite a dose-dependent increase in the plasma concentration of pracinostat, a similar increase in histone acetylation was not observed. As an extension, 10 additional patients with myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled to assess the safety and efficacy of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine. Six patients achieved a CR and 3 achieved a CR without platelet recovery with no added toxicity.

conclusionsThe results of the current study demonstrate that pracinostat is safe, with modest single-agent activity in patients with hematological malignancies. Cancer 2017;123:4851-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAzacitidineBenzimidazolesDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHematologic NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAzacitidineBenzimidazolesSB939 compoundacetylationepigenetichistonemethylationpracinostat

Identifiers

PMID28841236
PMCPMC5901648
OpenAlexW2745555207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.