Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840959›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2017

Tiny Microbes, Big Yields: enhancing food crop production with biological solutions.

Pankaj Trivedi, Peer M Schenk, Matthew D Wallenstein, Brajesh K Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Microbial Connection to Sustainable Agriculture.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Weaponising microbes for peace.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pankaj TrivediBioagricultural Science and Pest Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Peer M SchenkSchool of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Matthew D WallensteinDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Brajesh K SinghHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, 2753, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-associated microbiomes have tremendous potential to improve plant resilience and yields in farming systems. There is increasing evidence that biological technologies that use microbes or their metabolites can enhance nutrient uptake and yield, control pests and mitigate plant stress responses. However, to fully realize the potential of microbial technology, their efficacy and consistency under the broad range of real-world conditions need to be improved. While the optimization of microbial biofertilizers and biopesticides is advancing rapidly to enable use in various soils, crop varieties and environments, crop breeding programmes have yet to incorporate the selection of beneficial plant-microbe interactions to breed 'microbe-optimized plants'. Emerging efforts exploring microbiome engineering could lead to microbial consortia that are better suited to support plants. The combination of all three approaches could be integrated to achieve maximum benefits and significantly improved crop yields to address food security.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID28840959
PMCPMC5609239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.