Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840830›Full record

ArticleBioMedicine2017

Mesh materials and hernia repair.

Santhini Elango, Sakthivel Perumalsamy, Krishnakumar Ramachandran, Ketankumar Vadodaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Intestinal erosions following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Seroma prevention strategies in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. When helpful becomes harmful: a case-based narrative review of esophageal mesh migration after hiatal hernia repair.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Characterization andHeliyon · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evaluation of a Novel Absorbable Mesh in a Porcine Model of Abdominal Wall Repair.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Santhini ElangoCentre of Excellence for Medical Textiles, The South India Textile Research Association (SITRA), Coimbatore - 641 014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sakthivel PerumalsamyCentre of Excellence for Medical Textiles, The South India Textile Research Association (SITRA), Coimbatore - 641 014, Tamil Nadu, India.
Krishnakumar RamachandranCologenesis Healthcare Pvt Limited, Salem - 636 140, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ketankumar VadodariaCentre of Excellence for Medical Textiles, The South India Textile Research Association (SITRA), Coimbatore - 641 014, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hernia incidence has been observed since ancient time. Advancement in the medical textile industry came up with the variety of mesh materials to repair hernia, but none of them are without complications including recurrence of hernia. Therefore individuals once developed with the hernia could not lead a healthy and comfortable life. This drawn attention of surgeons, patients, researchers and industry to know the exact mechanism behind its development, complications and recurrence. Recent investigations highlighted the role of genetic factors and connective tissue disorders being the reason for the development of hernia apart from the abnormal pressure that is known to develop during other disease conditions. This review discusses different mesh materials, their advantages and disadvantages and their biological response after its implantation.

Identifiers

PMID28840830
PMCPMC5571666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.