Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840390›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Laparoscopic mesh removal for otherwise intractable inguinal pain following endoscopic hernia repair is feasible, safe and may be effective in selected patients.

G D Slooter, W A R Zwaans, C W Perquin, R M H Roumen, M R M Scheltinga

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06363903 (Autoimmume/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06363903 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Autoimmume/Inflammatory Syndrome Induced by Adjuvants (ASIA Syndrome) Caused by Polypropylene Mesh Implantation - a Pilot Study for Diagnostics and Treatment

TypeobservationalSponsorMaxima Medical CenterRan2022 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsAutoimmunity, Inguinal Hernia, Stress Urinary Incontinence, Pelvic Organ ProlapseArmsmesh allergy test, blood tests, Mesh removal
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why we remove mesh.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

G D SlooterDepartment of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
W A R ZwaansDepartment of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands. willemzwaans@gmail.com.
C W PerquinDepartment of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R M H RoumenDepartment of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M R M ScheltingaDepartment of General Surgery, Máxima Medical Centre, De Run 4600, P.O. Box 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven/Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Máxima Medisch Centrum · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is preferred over an open technique because of reduced recovery time, favorable cost effectiveness, and less chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Nevertheless, some patients develop a nociceptive inguinal pain syndrome possibly related to the presence of the mesh. This is the first study describing feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of laparoscopic mesh removal in patients with chronic pain after endoscopic hernia repair.

methodsPre- and intraoperative data of chronic pain patients scheduled for endoscopic mesh removal were prospectively collected by a standard evaluation form. Long-term efficacy was determined using pain scores, patient satisfaction, and quality of life questionnaire. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to determine significant differences between pre- and postoperative pain scores.

resultsFourteen patients were studied (11 males, median 52 years). Median operating time was 103 min. Conversion to open surgery was not required. One intraoperatively recognized bladder laceration was laparoscopically closed. Otherwise, no intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Eight months postoperatively (median), pain scores had dropped from eight to four (p < 0.01). Satisfaction was good or excellent in ten patients. A recurrent hernia developed in two patients requiring an open mesh repair in one.

conclusionsLaparoscopic mesh removal is a feasible, safe, and effective option in selected patients with chronic groin pain after endoscopic hernia repair in the hands of an experienced surgeon.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisDevice RemovalFeasibility StudiesFemaleGroinHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansIntractable PainLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeChronic painHernia, inguinalHerniorrhaphyLaparoscopyPainPostoperativeSurgical mesh

Identifiers

PMID28840390
OpenAlexW2747096046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.