Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840384›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

Survival benefit of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in high-grade endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective population-based cohort analysis.

Thomas Papathemelis, S Scharl, K Kronberger, M Gerken, A Scharl, A Pauer, M Klinkhammer-Schalke

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lymphadenectomy issues in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas PapathemelisFrauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany. papathemelis.thomas@klinikum-amberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-2610
S ScharlKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93051, Regensburg, Germany.
K KronbergerTumorzentrum Regensburg, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
M GerkenTumorzentrum Regensburg, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
A ScharlFrauenklinik, Klinikum St. Marien Amberg, Amberg, Germany.
A PauerTumorzentrum Regensburg, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
M Klinkhammer-SchalkeTumorzentrum Regensburg, Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Versorgungsforschung der Universität Regensburg, Am Biopark 9, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEOlgahospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe standard therapy for high-grade endometrial cancer is surgery but the therapeutic effects of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection (LND) are poorly investigated. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated overall survival, recurrence rates and recurrence-free survival among patients with high-grade type I and II endometrial carcinoma who underwent LND.

methodsThis study included 284 patients who are recorded in the German Tumor Centre Regensburg form 1998 to 2015 and were selected by cancer grading, the absence of secondary tumors, primary surgery including hysterectomy and available follow-up. 244 of the 284 patients in this cohort were unequivocally classified as R0 after resection.

resultsA significantly increased overall survival was observed for systematic LND of 25 or more paraaortic and pelvic lymph nodes versus patients who did not undergo such intervention (p < 0.001) or had elective LND of 1-24 lymph nodes both in univariable (p = 0.016) and multivariable (p = 0.014) analysis. A similar observation was made for recurrence-free survival of patients in the cohort who underwent complete tumor resection (R0). In addition, a reduced cumulative recurrence rate was observed for patients with systematic LND.

conclusionsOur study provides evidence that the systematic removal of 25 or more pelvic and paraaortic lymph nodes reduces the recurrence rate and that it is beneficial for the long-term overall and recurrence-free survival of patients with high-grade endometrial cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesEndometrial cancerLymphadenectomyOutcomeOverall survivalRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID28840384
PMCPMC11819445
OpenAlexW2747546851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.