Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840334›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

Patient preference and timing for exercise in breast cancer care.

Kathleen M Sturgeon, Carla Fisher, Gina McShea, Susan Kruse Sullivan, Dahlia Sataloff, Kathryn H Schmitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The efficacy and prescription of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Physical activity programming and counseling preferences among cancer survivors: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. What is helpful and not? Patients' opinions and beliefs of how to support reduced sedentary behavior during cancer treatment-a thematic analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in cancer rehabilitation: current prescription, pitfalls, and future directions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kathleen M SturgeonCollege of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA.
Carla FisherUniversity of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gina McSheaUniversity of Pennsylvania, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Susan Kruse SullivanUniversity of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dahlia SataloffUniversity of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathryn H SchmitzCollege of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA. kschmitz@phs.psu.edu.

Funding

The Women In Steady Exercise Research (WISER) SurwVor TrialU54CA155850 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHODOSH, LEWIS A · 2011 to 2015
$9.1M
NCI NIH HHS U54CA155850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise is recommended following cancer diagnosis and may be particularly valuable for women receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy treatments. We investigated breast cancer patient preference on exercise programming in a prospective manner and retrospectively assessed length of time between diagnosis and chemotherapy initiation. Sixty-seven newly diagnosed breast cancer patients responded to questions regarding exercise programming related to cancer treatment and surveys on current activity level. Additionally, a retrospective chart review was conducted on 500 random breast cancer patients. Age, cancer stage, treatment, and treatment dates were extracted. Women were interested in, or, absolutely wanted to, participate in an exercise program before treatment (76.2%). There was uncertainty regarding willingness to delay treatment; 49.2% were willing to delay their treatment if the program was recommended by their doctors, 41.8% would not, and 9.0% were too unsure to respond. However, women would like to hear information about an exercise program for cancer patients when they are first diagnosed (61.9%). We observed that 64.6% of women were below recommended levels of physical activity; yet, current activity was not associated with an interest in an exercise program or willingness to delay treatment. Retrospectively, we observed an average interval of 72.6 ± 34.6 days between cancer diagnosis and initiation of anthracycline-based chemotherapy treatment, with younger women with more advanced cancer receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Based on patient preference and length of time to chemotherapy initiation, a reasonable next step to promote the current recommendations for exercise could be to integrate exercise into breast cancer care earlier in treatment.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAgedAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCardiotoxicityChemotherapy, AdjuvantExerciseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAnthracyclineBreast cancerCardiotoxicityExercisePatient preference

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.