Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840322›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2017

Functional significance of extent and timing of muscle activation during double poling on-snow with increasing speed.

Chiara Zoppirolli, Gennaro Boccia, Lorenzo Bortolan, Federico Schena, Barbara Pellegrini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara ZoppirolliCeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain & Health), Via Matteo del Ben 5/b, 38068, Rovereto, Italy. chiara.zoppirolli@univr.it.
Gennaro BocciaCeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain & Health), Via Matteo del Ben 5/b, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Lorenzo BortolanCeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain & Health), Via Matteo del Ben 5/b, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Federico SchenaCeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain & Health), Via Matteo del Ben 5/b, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
Barbara PellegriniCeRiSM (Research Center Sport Mountain & Health), Via Matteo del Ben 5/b, 38068, Rovereto, Italy.
University of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the level of activation and timing of upper- and lower-body muscles during double poling at different speeds on snow.

methodsNineteen well-trained cross-country skiers volunteered to double pole on a flat snowy track at different speeds (15, 18, 21 km h

resultsDouble poling speed did not alter the sequence of muscle activation that started with hip flexors, continued with trunk flexors, shoulder, elbow and trunk extensors and ended with ankle plantar-flexors. However, higher speeds required an increasing involvement of thigh, trunk and shoulder muscles (P < 0.05) as well as an anticipation of their activation before pole plant (P < 0.05).

conclusionsA progressively earlier activation of trunk and lower limb muscles is a coordinative strategy that allows rapid achievement of optimal body posture prior to the exertion of poling phase. Moreover, earlier activation of these muscles as the speed increases provides adequate muscle stiffness in the shoulder and core regions for the acceptance of the poling load.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSkiingMovement controlMuscle activationMuscle sequenceOn-snow skiing

Identifiers

PMID28840322
OpenAlexW2745975448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.