SynthesisRheumatology international2018
Impact of hybrid molecular imaging in retroperitoneal fibrosis: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Rheumatology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- EANM/SNMMI guideline/procedure standard for [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Guideline
- Clinical and laboratory predictors of diagnostic efficacy ofRheumatology international · 2026Article
- Article
- State of the art ofClinical and translational imaging · 2021Review
- Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis.Der Radiologe · 2020Review
- [Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. German version].Der Radiologe · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this article was to critically assess the usefulness of hybrid molecular imaging (FDG PET/CT and FDG PET/MR) procedures in the evaluation of inflammatory activity in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF). A systematic review of the literature was performed using PubMed without timeline restriction and using the following keywords: retroperitoneal fibrosis, disease activity, diagnostic techniques, PET/CT, PET/MR. We evaluated full text articles written in the English language. Case reports, review articles or editorials and articles not in the field of interest of this review were excluded. Nine articles comprising a total of 186 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included and described in this systematic review. The new hybrid molecular imaging methods give promising results in the evaluation of the activity of the disease, quantification and prediction of therapeutic response and in tailoring medical therapy in RPF. FDG PET/CT can be a valuable tool in detecting disease activity, particularly in asymptomatic patients with RPF with acute phase reactant increase. Hybrid imaging can predict therapy response outcome and the best time for stent removal. Although PET/MR has potential advantage in small lesions and has reduced radiation exposure in comparison to PET/CT, PET quantification parameters have potentially higher diagnostic value over MR parameters in the evaluation of RPF. Acute phase reactants alone may not be reliable for the management and follow-up assessment of the disease. Hybrid imaging in RFP could be more comfortable, more accurate, with less radiation burden than different separate imaging studies acquired at different points in time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.