ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018
Prevalence of levator ani muscle avulsion and effect on quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility study of transvaginal biplanar convex ultrasound for evaluating levator ani muscle.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Article
- Exploring risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse at eastern of Democratic Republic of Congo: a case-control study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
- Levator ani and puborectalis muscle rupture: diagnosis and repair for perineal instability.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Article
- Online reported women's experiences of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal birth.BMC women's health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisLevator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion is associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). There is limited information on the prevalence of LAM avulsion in Chinese women with POP. This study evaluated the prevalence of LAM avulsion in women presenting with POP and the effects on their quality of life (QoL).
methodsThis prospective study was conducted in a tertiary urogynecology center. Chinese women presenting with POP were recruited and completed standardized questionnaires exploring their symptoms and QoL and underwent gynecological examination to assess the stage of POP and involved compartments. Four-dimensional translabial ultrasound (US) was performed on all women, and evaluation of LAM avulsion was done offline.
resultsThree hundred and ninety-eight women completed the study. The prevalence of LAM avulsion was 38.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.1-43.7%]; 31 (7.8%), 26 (6.5%), and 98 (24.6%) had left, right, and bilateral LAM avulsion, respectively. LAM avulsion was associated with a more advanced stage of prolapse (P < 0.005) and prolapse of stage ≥II of all three compartments. Bilateral LAM avulsion was associated with a more severe stage of prolapse. More women with LAM avulsion reported bothersome symptoms of prolapse and had higher Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI) and Urinary Incontinence Questionnaire (UIQ) scores, implying more impairment in QoL. However, after multivariate linear regression analysis, POP stage remained a significant predictor of POPDI and UDI scores (P ≤ 0.006); LAM avulsion was not a predictor (P = 0.2 and 0.27, respectively).
conclusionsLAM avulsion was detected in 39% of Chinese women with POP. It was associated with a more advanced POP stage, and these women had more impairment of QoL. However, LAM avulsion was not an independent factor influencing the QoL of these women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.