Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28840251›Full record

ReviewProgress in molecular and subcellular biology

Centromere Structure and Function.

Kerry Bloom, Vincenzo Costanzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Progress in molecular and subcellular biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mitotic drive in asymmetric epigenetic inheritance.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kerry BloomDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 623 Fordham Hall CB#3280, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-3280, USA. Kerry_bloom@unc.edu.
Vincenzo CostanzoDNA Metabolism Laboratory, IFOM, The FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Vai Adamello 16, 21139, Milan, Italy.
FIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology · ITUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Structure and Function of a Eukaryotic CentromereR01GM032238 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLOOM, KERRY S · 1985 to 2025
$6.2M
Structure and Function of a Eukaryotic CentromereR37GM032238 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BLOOM, KERRY S, YEH, ELAINE YING · 2011 to 2020
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032238NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM032238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The centromere is the genetic locus that specifies the site of kinetochore assembly, where the chromosome will attach to the kinetochore microtubule. The pericentromere is the physical region responsible for the geometry of bi-oriented sister kinetochores in metaphase. In budding yeast the 125 bp point centromere is sufficient to specify kinetochore assembly. The flanking region is enriched (3X) in cohesin and condensin relative to the remaining chromosome arms. The enrichment spans about 30-50 kb around each centromere. We refer to the flanking chromatin as the pericentromere in yeast. In mammals, a 5-10 Mb region dictates where the kinetochore is built. The kinetochore interacts with a very small fraction of DNA on the surface of the centromeric region. The remainder of the centromere lies between the sister kinetochores. This is typically called centromere chromatin. The chromatin sites that directly interface to microtubules cannot be identified due to the repeated sequence within the mammalian centromere. However in both yeast and mammals, the total amount of DNA between the sites of microtubule attachment in metaphase is highly conserved. In yeast the 16 chromosomes are clustered into a 250 nm diameter region, and 800 kb (16 × 50 kb) or ~1 Mb of DNA lies between sister kinetochores. In mammals, 5-10 Mb lies between sister kinetochores. In both organisms the sister kinetochores are separated by about 1 μm. Thus, centromeres of different organisms differ in how they specify kinetochore assembly, but there may be important centromere chromatin functions that are conserved throughout phylogeny. Recently, centromeric chromatin has been reconstituted in vitro using alpha satellite DNA revealing unexpected features of centromeric DNA organization, replication, and response to stress. We will focus on the conserved features of centromere in this review.

Indexed as

AnimalsCentromereChromatinKinetochoresMicrotubulesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeChromatin

Identifiers

PMID28840251
PMCPMC6535225
OpenAlexW2749847007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.