ReviewInterface focus2017
Extended genomes: symbiosis and evolution.
Review in Interface focus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis suggests the microbiome responds to Evolve and Resequence experiments in Drosophila melanogaster.BMC microbiology · 2021Pooled it
- Stable yet shifting: Early toxin dynamics in typical and atypical clownfish-anemone symbioses.Toxicon: X · 2026Article
- Spiroplasma Are Protective Heritable Symbionts With Low Physiological Impact in the Drosophilid Fly Zaprionus kolodkinae.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026Article
- Insights into pig resilience: the Microbiome-genetic connection.Porcine health management · 2026Review
- Linking genomic variation in Spiroplasma endosymbionts to male production and male-killing in the pea aphid.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Single-cell genome analysis of a feminizingMicrobial genomics · 2025Article
- Crop diversity induces trade-offs in microbial biopesticide susceptibility that could delay pest resistance evolution.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Prophage-encodedeLife · 2025Article
- The Microbiota and Evolution of Obesity.Endocrine reviews · 2025Review
- The Neonatal Microbiome: Implications for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Other Neurodegenerations.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Fitness trade-offs and the origins of endosymbiosis.PLoS biology · 2024Article
- Scrutinizing microbiome determinism: why deterministic hypotheses about the microbiome are conceptually ungrounded.History and philosophy of the life sciences · 2024Article
- Insecticide susceptibility in a planthopper pest increases following inoculation with cultured Arsenophonus.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Two male-killingRoyal Society open science · 2024Article
- Complex Endosymbioses I: From Primary to Complex Plastids, Serial Endosymbiotic Events.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Effects of anthropogenic stress on hosts and their microbiomes: Treated wastewater alters performance and gut microbiome of a key detritivore (Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- A generalised approach to the study and understanding of adaptive evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2023Article
- Male-killer symbiont screening reveals novel associations inAccess microbiology · 2023Article
- Isolation, culture and characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many aspects of an individual's biology derive from its interaction with symbiotic microbes, which further define many aspects of the ecology and evolution of the host species. The centrality of microbes in the function of individual organisms has given rise to the concept of the holobiont-that an individual's biology is best understood as a composite of the 'host organism' and symbionts within. This concept has been further elaborated to posit the holobiont as a unit of selection. In this review, I critically examine whether it is useful to consider holobionts as a unit of selection. I argue that microbial heredity-the direct passage of microbes from parent to offspring-is a key factor determining the degree to which the holobiont can usefully be considered a level of selection. Where direct vertical transmission (VT) is common, microbes form part of extended genomes whose dynamics can be modelled with simple population genetics, but that nevertheless have subtle quantitative distinctions from the classic mutation/selection model for nuclear genes. Without direct VT, the correlation between microbial fitness and host individual fitness erodes, and microbe fitness becomes associated with host survival only (rather than reproduction). Furthermore, turnover of microbes within a host may lessen associations between microbial fitness with host survival, and in polymicrobial communities, microbial fitness may derive largely from the ability to outcompete other microbes, to avoid host immune clearance and to minimize mortality through phage infection. These competing selection pressures make holobiont fitness a very minor consideration in determining symbiont evolution. Nevertheless, the importance of non-heritable microbes in organismal function is undoubted-and as such the evolutionary and ecological processes giving rise to variation and evolution of the microbes within and between host individuals represent a key research area in biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.