Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839790›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2015

Faecal calprotectin for differentiating between irritable bowel syndrome and inflammatory bowel disease: a useful screen in daily gastroenterology practice.

Ashwini Banerjee, M Srinivas, Richard Eyre, Robert Ellis, Norman Waugh, K D Bardhan, P Basumani

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin in predicting significant gastrointestinal diseases.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The role of faecal calprotectin in the differentiation of organic from functional bowel disorders.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  12. Possible Correlation betweenIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ashwini BanerjeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
M SrinivasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Richard EyreDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Robert EllisDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
Norman WaughDivision of Health Sciences, University of Warwick Medical School, UK.
K D BardhanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.
P BasumaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Rotherham Hospital, Rotherham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the best faecal calprotectin (FCP) cut-off level for differentiating between irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and organic disease, particularly inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), in patients presenting with chronic diarrhoea.

designRetrospective analysis of patients who had colonoscopy, histology and FCP completed within 2 months.

settingDistrict general hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive new patients with chronic diarrhoea lasting longer than 4 weeks.

interventionsPatients were seen by a single experienced gastroenterologist and listed for colonoscopy with histology. Laboratory investigations included a single faecal specimen for calprotectin assay (lower limit of detection: 8 µg/g), the results used for information only.

main outcome measuresSix FCP cut-off levels (range 8-150 µg/g) were compared against the 'gold standard' of histology: inflammation 'present' or 'absent'.

resultsOf 119 patients studied, 98 had normal colonoscopy and histology. The sensitivity of FCP to detect IBD at cut-off levels 8, 25 and 50 µg/g was 100% (with corresponding specificity 51%, 51%, 60%). In contrast, the lowest FCP cut-off, 8 µg/g, had 100% sensitivity to detect colonic inflammation, irrespective of cause (with negative predictive value (NPV) 100%). Importantly, 50/119 patients (42%) with FCP <8 µg/g had normal colonoscopy and histology.

conclusionsOur results suggest that using FCP to screen patients newly referred for chronic diarrhoea could exclude all without IBD and, at a lower cut-off, all without colonic inflammation, thus avoiding the need for colonoscopy. Such a major reduction has implications for resource allocation.

Indexed as

CHRONIC DIARRHOEAHISTOPATHOLOGYIBDIRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROMESTOOL MARKERS

Identifiers

PMID28839790
PMCPMC5369552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.