Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839747›Full record

ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2014

UK colorectal cancer patients are inadequately assessed for Lynch syndrome.

Maria Adelson, Samuel Pannick, James E East, Peter Risby, Peter Dawson, Kevin J Monahan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maria AdelsonFamily History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Samuel PannickDepartment of Gastroenterology, Family History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
James E EastTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Peter RisbyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Peter DawsonFamily History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.
Kevin J MonahanFamily History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, Department of Gastroenterology, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo establish whether colorectal cancer patients in two centres in the UK are screened appropriately for Lynch syndrome, in accordance with current international guidance.

designPatients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer over an 18-month period were identified from the UK National Bowel Cancer Audit Programme. Their records and management were reviewed retrospectively.

settingTwo university teaching hospitals, Imperial College Healthcare and Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trusts. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Whether patients were screened for Lynch syndrome-and the outcome of that evaluation, if it took place-were assessed from patients' clinical records. The age, tumour location and family history of screened patients were compared to those of unscreened patients.

resultsFive hundred and fifty three patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer were identified. Of these, 97 (17.5%) satisfied the revised Bethesda criteria, and should have undergone further assessment. There was no evidence that those guidelines had been contemporaneously applied to any patient. In practice, only 22 of the 97 (22.7%) eligible patients underwent evaluation. The results for 14 of those 22 (63.6%) supported a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome, but only nine of the 14 (64.3%) were referred for formal mismatch repair gene testing. No factors reliably predicted whether or not a patient would undergo Lynch syndrome screening.

conclusionsColorectal teams in the UK do not follow international guidance identifying the patients who should be screened for Lynch syndrome. Patients and their families are consequently excluded from programmes reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Multidisciplinary teams should work with their local genetics services to develop reliable algorithms for patient screening and referral.

Indexed as

Colorectal CancerColorectal Cancer GenesColorectal CarcinomaFamily CancerInherited Cancers

Identifiers

PMID28839747
PMCPMC5369742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.