ArticleFrontline gastroenterology2012
Administration of
Article in Frontline gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Provider-reported use of butylscopolamine in gastrointestinal endoscopy in Germany.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- The effects of the use of hyoscine-N-butylbromide during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.Turkish journal of surgery · 2023Article
- Unlocking quality in endoscopic mucosal resection.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2023Review
- Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) Position Statement on the Use of Hyoscine-Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Use of intravenous hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan) during gastrointestinal endoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2018Article
- Surveying and understanding colonoscopy technique.Frontline gastroenterology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCurrent British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) guidelines suggest that DESIGN AND
settingFollowing BSG endoscopy subcommittee approval, a short questionnaire was electronically administered to members of the BSG and the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
main outcome measures
results188 colonoscopists responded to some or all of the questions. 123/183 (67.2%) of respondents claimed they were aware of the BSG guidelines. 160/187 (85.6%) sometimes or always use
conclusionsCurrent BSG guidelines pertaining to
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.