Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839527›Full record

ArticleClinics and practice2017

A New Imaging Tool for Realtime Measurement of Flow Velocity in Intracranial Aneurysms.

Athanasios K Petridis, Marius Kaschner, Jan F Cornelius, Marcel A Kamp, Angelo Tortora, Hans-Jakob Steiger, Bernd Turowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Athanasios K PetridisDepartment of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Marius KaschnerInstitute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Jan F CorneliusDepartment of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Marcel A KampDepartment of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Angelo TortoraDepartment of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Hans-Jakob SteigerDepartment of Neurosurgery Institute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Bernd TurowskiInstitute of Neuroradiology, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With modern imaging modalities of the brain a significant number of unruptured aneurysms are detected. However, not every aneurysm is prone to rupture. Because treatment morbidity is about 10% it is crucial to identify unstable aneurysms for which treatment should be discussed. Recently, new imaging tools allow analysis of flow dynamics and wall stability have become available. It seems that they might provide additional data for better risk profiling. In this study we present a new imaging tool for analysis of flow dynamics, which calculates fluid velocity in an aneurysm (Phillips Electronics, N.V.). It may identify regions with high flow and calculate flow reduction after stenting of aneurysms. Contrast is injected with a stable injection speed of 2 mL/sec for 3 sec. Two clinical cases are illustrated. Velocity in aneurysms and areas of instability can be identified and calculated during angiography in real-time. After stenting and flow diverter deployment flow reduction in the internal carotid aneurysm was reduced by 60% and there was a reduction of about 65% in the posterior cerebral artery in the second case we are reporting. The dynamic flow software calculates the flow profile in the aneurysm immediately after contrast injection. It is a real-time, patient specific tool taking into account systole, diastole and flexibility of the vasculature. These factors are an improvement as compared to current models of computational flow dynamics. We think it is a highly efficient, user friendly tool. Further clinical studies are on their way.

Indexed as

aneurysmal flow dynamicsFlow diverter stentintracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID28839527
PMCPMC5543827
OpenAlexW2744525654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.