Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839520›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral microbiology2017

Oral microbial profiles of individuals with different levels of sugar intake.

Mette K Keller, Christine A Kressirer, Daniel Belstrøm, Svante Twetman, Anne C R Tanner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Microbiome variability and role ofJournal of oral microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [ModifiedRevista espanola de salud publica · 2023
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Free sugars and early childhood caries development: a prospective cohort study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Investigating the demographic history of Japan using ancient oral microbiota.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mette K KellerDepartment of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christine A KressirerDepartment of Microbiology, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6996-9894
Daniel BelstrømDepartment of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Svante TwetmanDepartment of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne C R TannerDepartment of Microbiology, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, USA.
University of Copenhagen · DKHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim was to compare the oral microbial profiles in young adults with an intake of free sugars above or below the current recommendations by the WHO for sugar consumption. Seventy subjects completed a Quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire to establish the proportion of free sugars in relation to the total energy intake (% E). Subjects with <5% E (

Indexed as

CariesHOMINGSoral microbiotasugar

Identifiers

PMID28839520
PMCPMC5560414
OpenAlexW2740399255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.