Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839267›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

A Systematic Protein Refolding Screen Method using the DGR Approach Reveals that Time and Secondary TSA are Essential Variables.

Yuanze Wang, Niels van Oosterwijk, Ameena M Ali, Alaa Adawy, Atsarina L Anindya, Alexander S S Dömling, Matthew R Groves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A proteome-wide map of chaperone-assisted protein refolding in a cytosol-like milieu.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nonrefoldability is Pervasive Across theJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Expression and Refolding of the Plant Chitinase FromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuanze WangUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Niels van OosterwijkUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ameena M AliUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alaa AdawyUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5517-6693
Atsarina L AnindyaUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Alexander S S DömlingUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Matthew R GrovesUniversity of Groningen, Department of Drug Design, A. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. M.R.Groves@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9859-5177
University of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refolding of proteins derived from inclusion bodies is very promising as it can provide a reliable source of target proteins of high purity. However, inclusion body-based protein production is often limited by the lack of techniques for the detection of correctly refolded protein. Thus, the selection of the refolding conditions is mostly achieved using trial and error approaches and is thus a time-consuming process. In this study, we use the latest developments in the differential scanning fluorimetry guided refolding approach as an analytical method to detect correctly refolded protein. We describe a systematic buffer screen that contains a 96-well primary pH-refolding screen in conjunction with a secondary additive screen. Our research demonstrates that this approach could be applied for determining refolding conditions for several proteins. In addition, it revealed which "helper" molecules, such as arginine and additives are essential. Four different proteins: HA-RBD, MDM2, IL-17A and PD-L1 were used to validate our refolding approach. Our systematic protocol evaluates the impact of the "helper" molecules, the pH, buffer system and time on the protein refolding process in a high-throughput fashion. Finally, we demonstrate that refolding time and a secondary thermal shift assay buffer screen are critical factors for improving refolding efficiency.

Indexed as

Protein RefoldingBuffersChromatography, GelHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein DenaturationProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsRecombinant ProteinsSolubilityBuffersProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28839267
PMCPMC5570958
OpenAlexW2749360192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.