Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28839161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Metagenomic analysis reveals a green sulfur bacterium as a potential coral symbiont.

Lin Cai, Guowei Zhou, Ren-Mao Tian, Haoya Tong, Weipeng Zhang, Jin Sun, Wei Ding, Yue Him Wong, James Y Xie, Jian-Wen Qiu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genomes of the Caribbean reef-building coralsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lin CaiShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Guowei ZhouShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ren-Mao TianShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Haoya TongShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Weipeng ZhangShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jin SunShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wei DingShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yue Him WongShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China.
James Y XieDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jian-Wen QiuDepartment of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1541-9627
Sheng LiuKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Hui HuangKey Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China. huanghui@scsio.ac.cn.
Pei-Yuan QianShenzhen Research Institute and Division of Life Science, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China. boqianpy@ust.hk.
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology · HKChinese Academy of Sciences · CNHong Kong Baptist University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs are ecologically significant habitats. Coral-algal symbiosis confers ecological success on coral reefs and coral-microbial symbiosis is also vital to coral reefs. However, current understanding of coral-microbial symbiosis on a genomic scale is largely unknown. Here we report a potential microbial symbiont in corals revealed by metagenomics-based genomic study. Microbial cells in coral were enriched for metagenomic analysis and a high-quality draft genome of "Candidatus Prosthecochloris korallensis" was recovered by metagenome assembly and genome binning. Phylogenetic analysis shows "Ca. P. korallensis" belongs to the Prosthecochloris clade and is clustered with two Prosthecochloris clones derived from Caribbean corals. Genomic analysis reveals "Ca. P. korallensis" has potentially important ecological functions including anoxygenic photosynthesis, carbon fixation via the reductive tricarboxylic acid (rTCA) cycle, nitrogen fixation, and sulfur oxidization. Core metabolic pathway analysis suggests "Ca. P. korallensis" is a green sulfur bacterium capable of photoautotrophy or mixotrophy. Potential host-microbial interaction reveals a symbiotic relationship: "Ca. P. korallensis" might provide organic and nitrogenous nutrients to its host and detoxify sulfide for the host; the host might provide "Ca. P. korallensis" with an anaerobic environment for survival, carbon dioxide and acetate for growth, and hydrogen sulfide as an electron donor for photosynthesis.

Indexed as

SymbiosisAnimalsAnthozoaCaribbean RegionChlorobiCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMetagenomicsPhylogenyWhole Genome Sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28839161
PMCPMC5571212
OpenAlexW2749333159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.