Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28838311›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

A smartphone-based consultation system for acute burns - methodological challenges related to follow-up of the system.

Marie Hasselberg, Lee Wallis, Paul Blessing, Lucie Laflamme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Utility of Telehealth Platforms Applied to Burns Management: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. A COVID-19 field hospital in a conference centre - The Cape Town, South Africa experience.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marie Hasselberga Department of Public Health Sciences , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.
Lee Wallisc Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Stellenbosch University , Bellville , South Africa.
Paul Blessingc Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences , Stellenbosch University , Bellville , South Africa.
Lucie Laflammea Department of Public Health Sciences , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA smartphone-based consultation system for acute burns is currently being implemented in the Western Cape, South Africa. Even though studies indicate that similar systems for burns tend to support valid diagnosis and influence patient management, the evidence is still sparse. There is a need for more in-depth evaluations, not least in resource-constrained settings where mHealth projects are increasing.

objectiveThis article describes the consultation system and assessments in relation to its implementation with a special focus on methodological challenges.

methodsA number of evaluations and assessments have been conducted, are ongoing or planned for in relation to the implementation of the teleconsultation system. Initial assessments showed that size and depth of burns could be assessed at least as well using photographs as at bedside and that the image quality of handheld devices can be used as well as computers. Studies on system usability are currently being done with a mixed-methods approach. A historical cohort design will be applied to assess the potential health impact of the system. Patients with burn injuries where the doctor at point of care has used the app to receive diagnostic support from a burns expert will be considered as exposed and patients with burn injuries where the app has not been used will be considered as non-exposed.

conclusionsSmartphone-based consultation systems have the potential to strengthen the assessment of burn injury in many settings. However, ethically and methodologically sound evaluations are needed to find the best systems and solutions. This article identifies challenges and suggests potential assessments in relation to the implementation of such a system.

Indexed as

SmartphoneBurnsFollow-Up StudiesHumansRemote ConsultationSouth AfricaTelemedicineAcute burnsburn outcome measuresimage-based diagnosticmHealthmHealth for Improved Access and Equity in Health Care

Identifiers

PMID28838311
PMCPMC5645658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.