Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28838066›Full record

ReviewILAR journal2017

Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) Resource: Genetic, Genomic, and Biological Knowledgebase for the Laboratory Mouse.

Janan T Eppig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ILAR journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Inherited Susceptibility to Urinary Tract Infections from Kidney Papilla to Bladder.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The Role ofmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Janan T EppigJackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine.

Funding

Mouse Genome DatabaseU41HG000330 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A, BULT, CAROL J · 2011 to 2020
$45.5M
Technical DevelopmentP41HD062499 · NICHD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MARTIN RINGWALD · 2011 to 2026
$37.3M
Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
Gene Ontology ConsortiumP41HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2004 to 2011
$27.4M
Mouse Models of Human Cancer DatabaseR01CA089713 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BULT, CAROL J · 2002 to 2025
$17.5M
CRE Driver Strain ResourcesR24OD011190 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI MURRAY, STEPHEN A, SMITH, CYNTHIA LOUISE · 2012 to 2022
$7.9M
GENE ONTOLOGY CONSORTIUMR01HG002273 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI BLAKE, JUDITH A · 2001 to 2003
$5.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA089713NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002273NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG000330NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273NICHD NIH HHS P41 HD062499NIH HHS R24 OD011190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) Resource supports basic, translational, and computational research by providing high-quality, integrated data on the genetics, genomics, and biology of the laboratory mouse. MGI serves a strategic role for the scientific community in facilitating biomedical, experimental, and computational studies investigating the genetics and processes of diseases and enabling the development and testing of new disease models and therapeutic interventions. This review describes the nexus of the body of growing genetic and biological data and the advances in computer technology in the late 1980s, including the World Wide Web, that together launched the beginnings of MGI. MGI develops and maintains a gold-standard resource that reflects the current state of knowledge, provides semantic and contextual data integration that fosters hypothesis testing, continually develops new and improved tools for searching and analysis, and partners with the scientific community to assure research data needs are met. Here we describe one slice of MGI relating to the development of community-wide large-scale mutagenesis and phenotyping projects and introduce ways to access and use these MGI data. References and links to additional MGI aspects are provided.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticAnimalsComputational BiologyDatabase Management SystemsGenomeGenomicsGenotypeInformation Storage and RetrievalKnowledge BasesMicePhenotypedatabasegeneticsgenomicshuman disease modelinformaticsmodel organismmousephenotypes

Identifiers

PMID28838066
PMCPMC5886341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.