Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28838028›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2017

Distinct in vivo target occupancy by bivalent- and induced-fit-like binding drugs.

Georges Vauquelin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Link between a highMedChemComm · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Georges VauquelinDepartment of Molecular and Biochemical Pharmacology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-1711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeOptimal drug therapy often requires long-lasting target occupancy While this attribute was usually linked to the drug's pharmacokinetic properties, the dissociation rate is now increasingly recognized to contribute as well. Nearly all the earlier pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) simulations encompassed single-step binding drugs and focused on k EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We compared the 24 h in vivo occupancy over time profiles of prototype bivalent- and induced-fit-like binding drugs (A and B) after one or repeated daily dosings, both without and with rebinding. Special attention was focused on the effect of each of the microscopic rate constants on the occupancy profiles and on the metrics to represent those profiles. KEY

resultsAlthough both models can be represented by the same mathematical formulation, drugs A and B display quite different occupancy profiles, even though they have the same potency. These differences can be attributed to the different effects of their microscopic rate constants on their composite k CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Closer attention should be paid to more complex binding models in PK-PD simulations. This may help pharmacologists and medicinal chemists to improve the translation of in vitro kinetic measurements from preclinical screening programmes into clinical efficiency.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPharmacokineticsComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsProtein BindingTime FactorsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID28838028
PMCPMC5715606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.