Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28837688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Lost in translation: The challenge of adapting integrated approaches for worker health and safety for low- and middle-income countries.

Glorian Sorensen, Eve M Nagler, Pratibha Pawar, Prakash C Gupta, Mangesh S Pednekar, Gregory R Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Barriers of Occupational Safety Implementation in Infrastructure Projects: Gaza Strip Case.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. International Total Worker Health: Applicability to Agribusiness in Latin America.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Leveraging the Domain of Work to Improve Migrant Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Glorian SorensenCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6625-7931
Eve M NaglerCenter for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Pratibha PawarHealis, Sekhsaria Institute for Public Health, Navi Mumbai, India.
Prakash C GuptaHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Mangesh S PednekarHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Gregory R WagnerHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Mumbai Worksite Tobacco Control StudyR01CA140304 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the process of adapting an intervention integrating occupational safety and health (OSH) and health promotion for manufacturing worksites in India and the challenges faced in implementing it; and explore how globalization trends may influence the implementation of these integrated approaches in India and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsThis study-conducted in 22 manufacturing worksites in Mumbai, India-adapted and implemented an evidence-based intervention tested in the U.S. that integrated OSH and tobacco control. The systematic adaptation process included formative research and pilot testing, to ensure that the tested intervention was tailored to the local setting. We used qualitative methods and process evaluation to assess the extent to which this intervention was implemented, and to explore barriers to implementation.

resultsWhile participating worksites agreed to implement this intervention, not all components of the adapted intervention were implemented fully in the 10 worksites assigned to the intervention condition. We found that the OSH infrastructure in India focused predominantly on regulatory compliance, medical screening (secondary prevention) and the treatment of injuries. We observed generally low levels of leadership support and commitment to OSH, evidenced by minimal management participation in the intervention, reluctance to discuss OSH issues with the study team or workers, and little receptivity to recommendations resulting from the industrial hygienist's reports.

conclusionIndia presents one example of a LMIC with a rising burden of non-communicable diseases and intensified exposures to both physical and organizational hazards on the job. Our experiences highlight the importance of national and global trends that shape workers' experiences on the job and their related health outcomes. Beyond a singular focus on prevention of non-communicable diseases, coordinated national and international efforts are needed to address worker health outcomes in the context of the conditions of work that clearly shape them.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesIncomeOccupational HealthHumansIndiaOrganizational InnovationPilot ProjectsSafety ManagementSmoking Cessation

Identifiers

PMID28837688
PMCPMC5570315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.