Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28837657›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2017

Mycetoma laboratory diagnosis: Review article.

Amel Altayeb Ahmed, Wendy van de Sande, Ahmed Hassan Fahal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Mycetoma in Uganda: A neglected tropical disease.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Mycetoma.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026
    Review
  4. The Brief Case: Danger is afoot!Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Eumycetoma on the Back.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Towards enhanced control of mycetoma: a roadmap to achieve the UN's sustainable development goals by 2030.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amel Altayeb AhmedThe Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Wendy van de SandeDepartment of Medical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ahmed Hassan FahalThe Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4922-7321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycetoma is a unique neglected tropical disease caused by a substantial number of microorganisms of fungal or bacterial origins. Identification of the causative organism and the disease extension are the first steps in the management of the affected patients and predicting disease treatment outcome and prognosis. Different laboratory-based diagnostic tools and techniques were developed over the years to determine and identify the causative agents. These include direct microscopy and cytological, histopathological, and immunohistochemical techniques in addition to the classical grain culture. More recently, various molecular-based techniques have joined the mycetoma diagnostic armamentarium. The available mycetoma diagnostic techniques are of various specificity and sensitivity rates. Most are invasive, time consuming, and operator dependent, and a combination of them is required to reach a diagnosis. In addition, they need a well-equipped laboratory and are therefore not field friendly. This review aims to provide an update on the laboratory investigations used in the diagnosis of mycetoma. It further aims to assist practising health professionals dealing with mycetoma by outlining the guidelines developed by the Mycetoma Research Centre, University of Khartoum, WHO collaborating centre on mycetoma following a cumulative experience of managing more than 7,700 mycetoma patients.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal AgentsBacteriaClinical Laboratory TechniquesFungiHumansMycetomaPractice Guidelines as TopicTreatment OutcomeTropical MedicineAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID28837657
PMCPMC5570215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.