ArticlePloS one2017
Hot-spot identification on a broad class of proteins and RNA suggest unifying principles of molecular recognition.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Tools and Strategies to Develop Peptide-Based Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- Identification and characterization of fragment binding sites for allosteric ligand design using the site identification by ligand competitive saturation hotspots approach (SILCS-Hotspots).Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects · 2020Article
- Spectral analysis of molecular dynamics simulations on PDZ: MD sectors.Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2020Article
- Fragment-based design of small molecule PCSK9 inhibitors using simulated annealing of chemical potential simulations.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chemically diverse fragments tend to collectively bind at localized sites on proteins, which is a cornerstone of fragment-based techniques. A central question is how general are these strategies for predicting a wide variety of molecular interactions such as small molecule-protein, protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid for both experimental and computational methods. To address this issue, we recently proposed three governing principles, (1) accurate prediction of fragment-macromolecule binding free energy, (2) accurate prediction of water-macromolecule binding free energy, and (3) locating sites on a macromolecule that have high affinity for a diversity of fragments and low affinity for water. To test the generality of these concepts we used the computational technique of Simulated Annealing of Chemical Potential to design one small fragment to break the RecA-RecA protein-protein interaction and three fragments that inhibit peptide-deformylase via water-mediated multi-body interactions. Experiments confirm the predictions that 6-hydroxydopamine potently inhibits RecA and that PDF inhibition quantitatively tracks the water-mediated binding predictions. Additionally, the principles correctly predict the essential bound waters in HIV Protease, the surprisingly extensive binding site of elastase, the pinpoint location of electron transfer in dihydrofolate reductase, the HIV TAT-TAR protein-RNA interactions, and the MDM2-MDM4 differential binding to p53. The experimental confirmations of highly non-obvious predictions combined with the precise characterization of a broad range of known phenomena lend strong support to the generality of fragment-based methods for characterizing molecular recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.