ArticleHand (New York, N.Y.)2018
Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand.
Article in Hand (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Readability Analysis of Commonly Cited Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Orthopaedic Joint Literature.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Observational
- An Objective Analysis of the Quality and Readability of Online Information on Breast Implant Illness.Cureus · 2025Article
- Changes in Health Education Literacy After Structured Web-Based Education Versus Self-Directed Online Information Seeking in Patients Undergoing Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: Nonrandomized, Controlled Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for Congenital Hand Differences.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Readability, Understandability, Usability, and Cultural Sensitivity of Online Patient Educational Materials (PEMs) for Lower Extremity Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Study.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2024Article
- Readability of Online Patient Education Materials for the 10 Most Common Hand Conditions.Cureus · 2024Article
- Article
- Digital Patient Education on Xanthelasma Palpebrarum: A Content Analysis.Clinics and practice · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Hand It to Dr Google: The Quality of Online Information on Ganglion Cysts.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
- Dupuytren's Contracture: The Readability of Online Information.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Kienböck Disease: Quality, Accuracy, and Readability of Online Information.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- Letter to Editor: Comments on "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
- Response to Letter Regarding "Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Pathology of the Hand".Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe American Medical Association (AMA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommend that patient education materials be written at no higher than a sixth-grade reading level.
methodsWe examined 100 online educational materials for the 10 hand conditions most commonly treated by hand surgeons, as reported by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. The listed conditions were carpal tunnel syndrome, basal joint arthritis of the thumb, de Quervain syndrome, Dupuytren's contracture, ganglion cysts, hand fractures, trigger finger, extensor tendon injuries, flexor tendon injuries, and mallet finger. Following a Google search for each condition, we analyzed the 10 most visited websites for each disorder utilizing the Flesch-Kincaid formula.
resultsThe average grade reading level of the 100 websites studied was 9.49 with a reading ease of 53.03 ("fairly difficult high school"). Only 29% of the websites were at or below the national average of an eighth-grade reading level. Carpal tunnel syndrome had the highest average grade reading level at 10.32 (standard deviation: 1.52), whereas hand fractures had the lowest at 8.14 (2.03). Every hand condition in this study had an average readability at or above the ninth-grade reading level.
conclusionsThe most frequently accessed materials for common maladies of the hand exceed both the readability limits recommended by the AMA and NIH, and the average reading ability of most US adults. Therefore, the most commonly accessed websites pertaining to hand pathology may not be comprehended by the audience for which it is intended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.