Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28836343›Full record

ReviewMaternal & child nutrition2018

Addressing barriers to maternal nutrition in low- and middle-income countries: A review of the evidence and programme implications.

Justine A Kavle, Megan Landry

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04414527 (Effects of Video-based Health Education on Health Status of Pregnant Mothers and Their Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 89 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04414527 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Video-based Health Education on Health Status of Pregnant Mothers and Their Infants (From 0 to 6 Months) in Dirashe District Southern Ethiopia - a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2020 to 2021Enrolled675ConditionsAnemia, Antenatal Care, Birth Outcomes, Worm InfectionArmsStandard counselling, Health-Video
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceptions of African Migrant Women Regarding Food Consumption During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in Australia: A Qualitative Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justine A KavleMaternal and Child Survival Program (MCSP), Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-6308
Megan LandryThe George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Milken Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adequate maternal nutrition during the "first 1,000 days" window is critical from conception through the first 6 months of life to improve nutritional status and reduce the risk of poor birth outcomes, such as low birthweight and preterm birth. Unfortunately, many programmes have targeted implementation and monitoring of nutrition interventions to infants and young children, rather than to women during pregnancy or post-partum. A literature review was conducted to identify barriers to food choice and consumption during pregnancy and lactation and to examine how low- and middle-income countries have addressed maternal nutrition in programmes. A literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted, and titles and abstracts reviewed by authors. Twenty-three studies were included in this review. Barriers to adequate nutrition during pregnancy included cultural beliefs related to knowledge of quantity of food to eat during pregnancy, amount of weight to gain during pregnancy, and "eating down" during pregnancy for fear of delivering a large baby. Foods considered inappropriate for consumption during pregnancy or lactation contributed to food restriction. Drivers of food choice were influenced by food aversions, economic constraints, and household food availability. Counselling on maternal diet and weight gain during pregnancy was seldom carried out. Programming to support healthy maternal diet and gestational weight gain during pregnancy is scant. Tailored, culturally resonant nutrition education and counselling on diet during pregnancy and lactation and weight gain during pregnancy, as well as monitoring of progress in maternal nutrition, are areas of needed attention.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyFetal DevelopmentHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaNutritional StatusPatient ComplianceAdultDeveloping CountriesFemaleFetal Growth RetardationFood PreferencesHumansInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaLactationcultural barriersfood choicelactationmaternal nutritionpregnancyweight gain during pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28836343
PMCPMC5763330
OpenAlexW2749823989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.