Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28836159›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2017

Motivating Older Adults with Cancer to Keep Moving: the Implications of Lifestyle Interventions on Physical Activity.

Thuy T Koll, Jessica N Semin, Brett M Grieb, William Dale

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pilot study of a telehealth perioperative physical activity intervention for older adults with cancer and their caregivers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thuy T KollDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine 986155 Nebraska Medical Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6155, USA. thuy.koll@unmc.edu.
Jessica N SeminDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine 986155 Nebraska Medical Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6155, USA.
Brett M GriebDivision of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine 986155 Nebraska Medical Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-6155, USA.
William DaleArthur M. Coppola Family Chair Department of Supportive Care Medicine City of Hope, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010-3000, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purposes of this review are to describe the unique needs and preferences of older adults with cancer regarding physical activity and to outline the essential characteristics associated with increased physical activity resulting from lifestyle interventions in older adults. RECENT

findingsFunctional decline is accelerated in inactive and sedentary older adults. Even a modest increase in physical activity can improve physical function for older cancer survivors. Participation in physical activity is influenced by diverse individual-level factors, behavioral characteristics and skills and social and environmental factors. Thus, programs that are tailored to older adults' preferences provide social support and remove obstacles to participation may be more effective, particularly for older adults with low physical activity and sedentary lifestyle.

Indexed as

ExerciseAgedFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMotor ActivityNeoplasmsSedentary BehaviorSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesAnd lifestyle interventionsCancer survivorsOlder adultsPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID28836159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.