Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28836102›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2017

Sensory Neuronopathies.

Allison Crowell, Kelly G Gwathmey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Allison CrowellDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Kelly G GwathmeyDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800394, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. kgg2p@virginia.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe sensory neuronopathies are sensory-predominant polyneuropathies that result from damage to the dorsal root and trigeminal sensory ganglia. This review explores the various causes of acquired sensory neuronopathies, the approach to diagnosis, and treatment. RECENT

findingsDiagnostic criteria have recently been published and validated to allow differentiation of sensory neuronopathies from other polyneuropathies. On the basis of serial electrodiagnostic studies, the treatment window for the acquired sensory neuronopathies has been identified as approximately 8 months. If treatment is initiated within 2 months of symptom onset, there is a better opportunity for improvement of the patient's condition. Even though sensory neuronopathies are rare, significant progress has been made regarding characterization of their clinical, electrophysiologic, and imaging features. This does not hold true, however, for treatment. There have been no randomized controlled clinical trials to guide management of these diseases, and a standard treatment approach remains undetermined.

Indexed as

ElectrodiagnosisGanglia, SpinalHumansPolyneuropathiesDorsal root ganglionDorsal root ganglionopathyParaneoplastic neuropathySensory neuronopathySjögren’s syndrome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.