Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835996›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2017

[Work and training conditions of residents in urology in Germany : Results of a 2015 nationwide survey by the German Society of Residents in Urology].

H Arnold, C P Meyer, J Salem, M Raspe, J P Struck, H Borgmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Meta-analysis of effort-reward imbalance prevalence among physicians.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. [Urology-both future and family oriented!]Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020
    Article
  12. [Alliance of Young Doctors - Shaping the future of the healthcare system].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

H Arnold, Berlin, Deutschland. h.arnold@gesru.de.
C P MeyerKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
J SalemKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Köln, Deutschland.
M RaspeMedizinische Klinik m.S. Infektiologie und Pneumologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.
J P StruckKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
H BorgmannKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality urologic residency training programs are crucial to secure both the future of our specialty and patient care. However, little is known about the current training and working conditions among German urology residents.

objectivesTo comprehensively assess the training- and working conditions among urologic residents in Germany. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe GeSRU invited all German urologic residents to complete an online survey on training- and work conditions. Furthermore, the model of effort-reward imbalance (ERI) was applied to measure psychosocial strain at work.

resultsA total of 476 urologic residents participated in the survey. Workdays are characterized by high pace and workload and economic considerations. This comes at the cost of professional training, research and family time. Due to these circumstances, a relevant part of residents draws or at least considers consequences. Psychosocial strain among participants is high and conveys a risk for physicians' health and patients' quality of care.

conclusionOur findings call for an adjustment of urologic working and training conditions to preserve high-quality medical treatment and to ensure an attractive working environment.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleGermanyHumansJob SatisfactionMalePhysician AssistantsSurveys and QuestionnairesUrologyWork-Life BalanceWorkloadEconomic pressureEffort-reward imbalanceSurgical trainingUrologic residencyWork strain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.