Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28835891›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2017

Patient experience of lung volume reduction procedures for emphysema: a qualitative service improvement project.

Sara Buttery, Adam Lewis, Inger Oey, Joanne Hargrave, David Waller, Michael Steiner, Pallav L Shah, Samuel V Kemp, Simon Jordan, Nicholas S Hopkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lung volume reduction surgeryThe European respiratory journal · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. The Impact of a Newly Established Multidisciplinary Team on the Interventional Treatment of Patients With Emphysema.Clinical medicine insights. Circulatory, respiratory and pulmonary medicine · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sara ButteryNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adam LewisNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Inger OeyLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK.
Joanne HargraveLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK.
David WallerLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK.
Michael SteinerLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Foundation Trust, Leicester, UK.
Pallav L ShahNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Samuel V KempNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Simon JordanNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.
Nicholas S HopkinsonNIHR Respiratory Disease, Biomedical Research Unit at the Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3235-0454

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1014-35051Medical Research Council MC_PC_12032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this service improvement project was to gain understanding of the patient experience of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and endobronchial valve (EBV) placement, from referral through to post-discharge care. Focus group interviews were carried out in two tertiary centres in London and Leicester, UK. Sixteen patients who had undergone lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), endobronchial valve (EBV) placement, or both, were recruited. Prior to participation in each focus group, participants completed a questionnaire to guide and focus discussion. Thematic analysis identified common themes to the participant experience of receiving lung volume reduction interventions. Themes included patient focus on declining health and the need to "fight" for a referral; consequences of having procedures and potential unexpected complications; and vulnerability post discharge and limited continuity of care. Participants were clear that the benefits of having had either LVRS or EBV procedures outweighed any difficulties experienced. Participants were keen to have further similar interventions if appropriate. These data confirm the need to develop more systematic lung volume reduction pathways, provide appropriate information, and ensure that post-discharge care is optimal.

Identifiers

PMID28835891
PMCPMC5553440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.